Antichrist Must Come First and Sit in the Temple Claiming to be God, Causing a Great Falling Away from the Christian Faith

The Amazing Parallels of End Time Scriptures (Excerpt)
By John Aggson Sr., Liberty To The Captives

AntiChrist will come before Christ returns and he will sit in the rebuilt temple in Jerusalem claiming to be God. Why is it that people can never see the blindness and sin in their OWN GENERATION? Why can we look back to the past and see the sins of others in the Bible down through time, but do not even suspect that today, we are doing the same thing the Pharisees of old did? Why can we not see the “blindness” and “callousness” in our own hearts?

Many folks have gotten fed up over “arguing:” over this subject, and say that “they refuse to even discuss it anymore!” I have seen brethren almost come to blows and scream and yell at each other over this topic! The devil gets really angry when it is brought up, because it is exposing one of his GREATEST DECEITS THAT HE IS FOISTING UPON GOD’S UNSUSPECTING CHURCH IN THE END TIME! It is certainly wrong to get ANGRY over anything and get mad at each other, but it is not wrong to discuss such a serious and important matter as this!? Satan just loves that feint! That “cop out!” He knows that then every one will be afraid to bring the subject up after that for fear of starting a “hullabullo,” and will just not talk about it. Then folks go on teaching their perverted and distorted view to the flock of God’s Church! He is so clever! First of all, it is NOT a light thing, and will have very dramatic negative effects on God’s Church when things do not transpire as folks have been taught they will!

Most folks teaching this “pre-trib” view are doing it in ignorance; just “parroting” what they have been taught since they got saved, without having ever taken the time to study it all out carefully, and prayerfully. The Lord is very merciful, and understanding, and patient. He is trying to get folks to “see the light” on this, but it is very difficult. “As the branch bends, so grows the tree!?” And once a person is grounded deeply in this false belief system, it seems to be very hard to convince them otherwise, or to even get them to LOOK AT THE FACTS surrounding all this, and read Scriptures like the ones in this study.

Most will “stubbornly” cling to this false view, until it becomes apparent that it is wrong, and then they will say, “Oh WHY, didn’t we see this plain and simple truth laid out in the Scriptures?” “WHY couldn’t we see what Jesus warned SO CLEARLY of concerning all this?” Suddenly the “blinders” will be “ripped off” and they will clearly see; but too late to alter the effects of what it will cause on “the Body!” Those who are “strong” in the Lord will survive, but sadly, it will not go so good for those who “follow afar off; who will begin to question their FAITH, and the LORD, and to become very confused!” Many may just “give up!?”

This is something that should be brought out into the open and discussed above almost all else, after Salvation and other basics of the Faith! People say that it is just “causing division.” The TRUTH always causes division among those who resent hearing it! Jesus’s Words caused division. Paul’s words caused division, and Paul ARGUED with the Pharisees and “contended” and “disputed” with them for 3 years in the Book of Acts, before getting fed up with them and telling them he’d had it with them and was now going to the Gentiles! So it is not wrong to “contend” for the Truth!

Many Christians will support the antiChrist when he comes, thinking that he couldn’t possibly be the antiChrist or they would have been raptured out already!? He’s not coming with “horns and hoofs” and a “pitchfork!?” He will appear as “AN ANGEL OF LIGHT!” He will appear to be a very righteous and Godly man, a great man of peace, who will be championing the cause of Israel in the world courts, demanding that they be given the right to rebuild their temple, (which he plans to sit in and rule from) and that they should be given the right to re-start their animal sacrifices once again.

Folks will think he’s the greatest man of peace and friend of Israel to ever come along!? He’s going to fool nearly EVERYONE! DON’T YOU BE DECEIVED! Read these Scriptures again and pray over them, asking the Lord if these things are really the truth!? Satan is setting the entire church system up for the greatest “sucker punch” he’s ever given them; knocking their faith out by total surprise and shock, when things do not turn out the way folks have been taught! He’s lulled almost the entire church to sleep. Wake up and see what’s coming! He just LOVES this method of catching folks off guard by total surprise, and causing the greatest amount of fear possible in an instant! It causes such great confusion, and he is the “author of confusion.” He wants to totally KNOCK OUT THE CHURCH IN ONE PUNCH!!!

Like a great commanding general who studies out his war strategies long in advance, Satan sat back and looked over this “end time” scenario centuries ago. He knew he would have to put the Church to sleep to be able to catch them by surprise in this fashion. He began to enter the Church with false “sleepy” doctrines.

Pre-trib rapture teaching is part of Satan’s long term strategy to get the Church right where he wants us so he can wreak the most havoc and cause the greatest amount of confusion and damage possible when his man, the “beast” or “antiChrist” comes to power!? The Church will “rock and reel” under the fiery darts of the one who will “speak great words against the Most High,” and “wear out the Saints of the Most High;” who will “make war with the Saints and PREVAIL against them!?” And when the “guillotines begin to fall,” and people begin to lose their heads for refusing to deny their Faith in Jesus Christ, many may begin to “jump off the boat” like “scared men fleeing a sinking ship!?”

Instead of a “pre-tribulation rapture,” many are going to be “yanked” out of their beds in the middle of the night, by complete surprise; by “jackbooted” storm troopers, brandishing sub-machine guns, and dressed in black S.W.A.T. gear; and hauled off to PRISON CAMPS, that have already been set up all over America, under a program first designed by Lt. Colonel Oliver North, in the days of President Ronald Reagan, called “REX 84!” This was even exposed in Congress by Congressman Jack Brooks, who publicly challenged Oliver North about it and was told to “shut up” as it was a matter of national security! Although originally designed to “house” American gun-owners and patriots who refuse to go along with a “new world order” takeover — complete with a massive “gun confiscation program” — as well as other “dissidents;” this same program in the hands of a future administration may be used to lock up even other “Christian dissidents” who, although “peaceful” and non-violent, do not “believe” the way they are supposed to (ie: folks who dare to expose America and Israel’s sins!). Daniel the Prophet also spoke of this same event over and over; of a GREAT PERSECUTION of God’s Saints in the END TIME TRIBULATION PERIOD, under the TERRIFYING REIGN OF THE ANTICHRIST.

Many may support the antiChrist thinking he’s a good man, and not suspecting him at all because they have been taught they will be “raptured out” first before he comes!? Wake up America! YOU ARE the “MIGHTY AND THE HOLY PEOPLE!” spoken of by Daniel the prophet. The American churches are going to feel the main brunt of this persecution, along with the tiny nation of Israel!

The “indignation” spoken of by Daniel is “God’s indignation” against the nation of Israel for “trying to take their kingdom back in the flesh” without going through the proper “doorway” of JESUS CHRIST His Son, (as per John 10) and winning the world through His love, instead of considering themselves better than everyone else (God is no respecter of persons) and mowing them down with machine guns, bombs and bullets, to take back what they consider “rightfully theirs,” — but is NOT since the Lord drove them out 2,000 years ago. And also because they are willing to accept “one who comes in his own name” to get this great advantage and blessing, instead of having accepted Him who came “in the name of His Father,” Jesus Christ! This “indignation of God” is also against the duped American church system for “aiding and abbetting” them in this great end time “fiasco!”

Both the American church system and the modern nation of so-called “Israel” are going to be PURGED AND PURIFIED AND MADE WHITE HERE to get them straightened out on this issue! When they finally realize all this — under the antiChrist’s relentless attacks and his actual “winning” against them and subduing and destroying them — AND THEY REPENT (as per Zechariah 13), then the “Lord will come and fight against those nations that have come against them, and He will return in all His glory to fight for His people and deliver them from their STRONG OPPRESSOR!” (as per Zechariah 14).

This is another “great lie” that has entered the “corrupt and compromised American church system” that the Lord is going to expose before all, before the great day of His Coming! Jesus said in John chapters 8 & 10, to the Pharisees, that they were not going to be saved and blessed by God merely because they were “flesh sons of Abraham,” and that they had to go through “HIM, the ‘DOOR’, to get into the kingdom!?” Now, 2,000 years later the same bunch with the same mindset have returned to foist this same belief on the followers of Christ, and most have warmly received it with open arms, no questions asked, and would support them to the death, fighting to get their land back for them — thinking that they are “doing God service!?” But don’t worry! God is going to “straighten everyone out on this” before the Lord returns! It will be made very plain!

As both America and Israel “rock and reel” under the antiChrist’s future attacks, and coming terrorist attacks — and natural disasters like famines, earthquakes, weather related disasters, disease, and ill health — many will TURN HARD to the Lord and begin questioning, “why is all this coming upon us?”

Most Churches are turning their people into “MODERN PHARISEES” instead of loving followers of Christ, like the early disciples were. And then they are built on the false foundation of these other modern “comfortable” teachings that put them TOTALLY TO SLEEP, concerning the totally serious and sometimes “horrifying” end time events that are coming; and make them into “self-righteous judges” of today’s “wicked sinners” and “publicans and harlots,” who condemn folks to hell with their tongues, instead of loving them into the kingdom. The TRIBULATION is the time period in which the antiChrist tries to stamp out all other religions, and mainly Christianity; and to foist upon the world the worship of himself as God. During the tribulation, 1/3rd of everything is destroyed by the Lord’s “selective judgments,” while we are protected miraculously by the Lord right here on the earth.

Palestine's Bid for Statehood Status Would Find Majority Support in the United Nations

Of all the obstacles blocking the way to peace between the Palestinians and Israelis, the status of Jerusalem is arguably the most intractable. For Israelis, all of the city, including East Jerusalem and its West Bank suburbs captured in 1967, is their "eternal and indivisible" capital, the home the Jews dreamed of through 2,000 years of exile, and the site of their revered Western Wall. For Palestinians, there can be no peace until Israel cedes them control over East Jerusalem, a symbol of their national struggle and home to Islam's third holiest site, al-Aqsa mosque and the glittering Dome of the Rock.

In the absence of a deal, or even meaningful negotiations, Israel has been busy developing the holy city, building impressive, stone-clad neighbourhoods across the annexed land in defiance of constant international criticism. Israeli officials are also pushing to expand the nearby settlements of Gilo and Har Homa, thereby building a broad, concrete crescent just north of the hilltop town of Bethlehem.

Some 35 percent of Palestinian economic activity is centered on a line that stretches from Bethlehem through East Jerusalem and on to Ramallah, the West Bank's administrative centre, north of Jerusalem. Critics say the southern settlements will snap this link.

"It is like putting a ribbon around a finger and pulling tighter and tighter until all the blood is cut off," said Ashraf Khatib, a Palestinian activist from East Jerusalem.

"But it is not just in the south. The Israelis are creating facts on the ground across the eastern city," he added.

A proud exponent of that policy is Aryeh King, the founder of the Israeli Land Fund whose stated mission is to "reclaim the land of Israel for the people of Israel".

"We are locating property in all of East Jerusalem. In Jerusalem, every piece of land is important. All the plots put together can change the reality," said King."The reality we don't want to see happen is one that we think would lead to catastrophe - the division of the city."

Jews, from Biblical kings such as David and Solomon to present day Israelis, see Jerusalem as the home of their religion and as a national capital fit for their people. Most Israelis dismiss accusations their presence in East Jerusalem is illegal and bridle at the term "settlement" to describe what they refer to as Jewish neighbourhoods.[Source]

Israel Sees UN Majority for Palestine Status Upgrade

Reuters
August 5, 2012

The Palestinians' bid to upgrade their status at the United Nations would find majority support there but would not bring them closer to statehood and peace with Israel, Israel's U.N. envoy said on Sunday.

Citing stalled peacemaking and Israeli settlement-building on occupied West Bank land where they seek sovereign independence, the Palestinians said on Saturday they would renew a bid to win U.N. recognition as a state.

Ron Prosor, the Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, accused the Palestinians of trying to recapture international attention that has shifted to crises in Iran, Egypt and Syria.

"There is an attempt (by the Palestinians) to make unilateral moves in order to internationalize the conflict," Prosor told Israel Radio in a telephone interview.

"But beyond what are perhaps the feelings of frustration, it is important to remember that the path to peace really is through the negotiating table with Israel."

The Palestinians want to found a state in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, which Israel captured in the 1967 war. Though Israel quit Gaza in 2005, it claims East Jerusalem as its capital - a move not recognized abroad - and says it would keep swathes of West Bank settlements under any peace deal. The United Nations deems the settlements illegal.

Full U.N. membership for Palestine would require approval by the Security Council, where Israel's ally, the United States, would likely wield its veto given its demand the Palestinians set up their state in agreement with the Jewish state.

So the Palestinians, in what they describe as an interim move, plan to ask the U.N. General Assembly next month to accord them non-member observer status, which would allow them to join a number of U.N. agencies and the International Criminal Court.

The Palestinians are currently a U.N. observer "entity" with no voting rights. A similar statehood upgrade drive last year proved short-lived amid financial sanctions and diplomatic counter-lobbying by Israel and the United States.

Prosor said the Palestinians have a "guaranteed majority" in the 193-member General Assembly - enough to bestow non-member observer status, which the envoy predicted would be used "to hurt us (Israel)" in various international forums.

Israel has accused Western-backed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas of going to the United Nations to evade negotiations that would entail both territorial compromise and that he reassert control over Gaza, which he lost in a 2007 civil war to Hamas Islamists hostile to the Jewish state.

"In essence, Abu Mazen (Abbas) today has zero control in Gaza," Prosor said in separate remarks to Israel's Army Radio, adding that the Palestinians' U.N. campaign "will change nothing on the ground".

Palestinians have made a freeze on Israeli settlement in the West Bank and East Jerusalem a condition for returning to peace talks. Israel cites biblical and historical ties to the areas and says the settlement issue should be decided in negotiations.

Related:

• The Importance of Jerusalem and the Third Temple Being Built for Anti-christ
• Five Steps of the Plan to Produce Antichrist
• Obama Favors Arab Sovereignty Over the Temple Mount
• After the Third World War, the New Temple Will Be Rebuilt for Antichrist, Not Jesus Christ
• Fervent Masonic Desire to Rebuild Solomon's Temple
• Zionism vs. Peace in the Middle East
• The Age to Come: 'The Kingdom Age' vs. 'The Eternal Age'
• In the Age to Come, We Shall Have Eternal Life
• The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
• The Battle Over the Temple Mount
• Fatah-Hamas Pact and the Third Intifada
• The Fourth and Final Kingdom
• A Fourth and Final Global Empire Will Arise Out of Chaos, Just as the Third Reich Arose from Chaos for Hitler
• Barren National Israel Has Been Replaced By Fruitful Spiritual Israel

Jerusalem is the Most Difficult Symbolic Issue for the Peace Process

Insight: Jerusalem Expansion Reaches Point of No Return

Reuters
May 22, 2012

Named for the crash site of an airforce plane shot down during the Six Day War in 1967, Givat HaMatos may yet prove the place where Palestinian hopes of a creating a capital in Jerusalem also plunge to earth.

'Airplane Hill' lies on the southern fringes of Jerusalem's city limits - rock-strewn land dotted with shabby, prefabricated bungalows and the occasional pine tree.

Once a tranquil backwater, the area has become the focus of hectic activity in the last six months, with Israeli authorities releasing plans for 2,610 housing units and 1,110 hotel rooms.

With the approval process going more quickly than expected, building could start later this year, creating the first new Israeli settlement in 15 years among the sprawl of a modern Jerusalem that is spread out over many hills.

If that happens, it would effectively cut off the city's mainly Arab neighbourhoods from Bethlehem in the occupied West Bank, imperiling the Palestinians' prospects for establishing a coherent capital and with it their goal of an independent state.

"There is only so much territorial abuse this tortured land can take before we kill the political options of saving the two- state solution," said Daniel Seidemann, an Israeli attorney who monitors urban developments he thinks affect chances for peace.

"What is happening at Givat HaMatos is a game changer," he said, his finger tapping a map of the area for added emphasis. "Events are careering out of control."

Of all the obstacles blocking the way to peace between the Palestinians and Israelis, the status of Jerusalem is arguably the most intractable.

"It's the most difficult symbolic issue for the peace process. It's an emotional issue," Israeli Prime Benjamin Netanyahu told Reuters earlier this month.

For Israelis, all of the city, including East Jerusalem and its West Bank suburbs captured in 1967, is their "eternal and indivisible" capital, the home the Jews dreamed of through 2,000 years of exile, and the site of their revered Western Wall.

For Palestinians, there can be no peace until Israel cedes them control over East Jerusalem, a symbol of their national struggle and home to Islam's third holiest site, al-Aqsa mosque and the glittering Dome of the Rock.

In the absence of a deal, or even meaningful negotiations, Israel has been busy developing the holy city, building impressive, stone-clad neighbourhoods across the annexed land in defiance of constant international criticism.

PRECIOUS LAND

A series of recent interviews with Israelis and Palestinians suggests that the development is at a tipping point.

Plans for Givat HaMatos are not taking place in a vacuum.

Israeli officials are also pushing to expand the nearby settlements of Gilo and Har Homa, thereby building a broad, concrete crescent just north of the hilltop town of Bethlehem.

Some 35 percent of Palestinian economic activity is centered on a line that stretches from Bethlehem through East Jerusalem and on to Ramallah, the West Bank's administrative centre, north of Jerusalem. Critics say the southern settlements will snap this link.

"It is like putting a ribbon around a finger and pulling tighter and tighter until all the blood is cut off," said Ashraf Khatib, a Palestinian activist from East Jerusalem.

"But it is not just in the south. The Israelis are creating facts on the ground across the eastern city," he added.

A proud exponent of that policy is Aryeh King, the founder of the Israeli Land Fund whose stated mission is to "reclaim the land of Israel for the people of Israel".

In April, he secured the eviction of an Arab family from a home in the Arab neighborhood of Beit Hanina after a court ruled that the place had been legally bought by a Jew. He immediately moved half a dozen young supporters into the house and promised further evictions in the months ahead.

"We are locating property in all of East Jerusalem. In Jerusalem, every piece of land is important. All the plots put together can change the reality," said King, standing in the backyard of the low-rise building he had just taken over.

"The reality we don't want to see happen is one that we think would lead to catastrophe - the division of the city."

Jews, from Biblical kings such as David and Solomon to present day Israelis, see Jerusalem as the home of their religion and as a national capital fit for their people.

Most Israelis dismiss accusations their presence in East Jerusalem is illegal and bridle at the term "settlement" to describe what they refer to as Jewish neighbourhoods.

POPULATION GROWTH

As British imperial forces left Palestine in 1948, 60 percent of Jerusalem's population was Jewish. The United Nations had planned to put the city under international control, but war intervened and when a truce ended it, Jordan held the eastern sector, including the walled Old City with its sacred sites.

Israel controlled the West Jerusalem.

Following the 1967 war, Israel swept away the armistice boundary, or Green Line, and more than doubled the city limits. In 1980, parliament passed a law declaring united Jerusalem as the national capital, a move never recognized internationally.

Palestinians say the new masters have strived to alter the demographics, limiting land available to develop in Arab neighbourhoods, imposing residency rules that push Arabs out and demolishing more than 2,000 of their homes in East Jerusalem.

This has had little impact on population ratios, even as the number of inhabitants has soared from 263,000 in 1967 to around 800,000 today. Indeed the Arab ratio is climbing, with secular Israelis reluctant to settle in a city known for tensions and as home to growing numbers of religiously observant Jews.

According to the Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies, 36 percent of inhabitants were Arab in 2009 against 28 percent in 1980. City officials say the figure will hit 40 percent by 2020. By contrast, 20 percent of Israel's total population are Arabs.

"Jerusalem is not a Jewish city, not an Israeli city, but a bi-national city. It is not a united city. It is divided in more ways than you could care to imagine," said Seidemann, who is the go-to person for diplomats seeking information on town planning.

The divisions are often invisible to the naked eye. Outsiders rarely notice when they cross from west to east, and are surprised if Jewish taxi drivers refuse to take them to hotels in Arab areas because they fear being pelted with stones.

Likewise, both visitors and residents often express surprise when told that leafy districts of solid, modern homes are the very settlements which are so regularly denounced abroad.

"This place isn't a settlement," said Ofer Dror, a 36-year-old technician and resident of Har Homa, a terraced suburb of neat, white-stone apartments housing 13,000 Israelis that overlooks the Biblical town of Bethlehem.

"If we were behind some fence or a separation line then I might think that," he added, clearly surprised by the concept.

WINNERS AND LOSERS

Ironically, just a hundred meters from Har Homa's outer ring of houses, lives a Palestinian shepherd stranded by a fence.

Saed al-Zawahri lost a third of his land as the settlement spread this past decade. He grazes his small flock of sheep over his remaining three acres, cut off from Bethlehem, which lies tantalizingly close behind coils of barbed wire.

Israel has sealed much of the West Bank behind walls and fences following a wave of Palestinian suicide attacks at the start of the last decade that killed many hundred Israelis.

This has ensnared Zawahri in a bureaucratic mess.

Denied Jerusalem residency, he says he is only allowed to travel to Bethlehem but is not entitled to register a car with Israeli license plates to drive on the Israelis-only roads he would need to get him there. Likewise, he says he does not have the right to shop in the adjacent Har Homa and must call in special deliveries from Palestinian stores.

"They plan a thousand years ahead," said the 74-year-old shepherd. "They plan to get rid of us."

Asked if anything could stop the Israeli expansion, he smiled wryly.

"Only God. All the Arab armies already tried and failed," he said, referring to the wars of 1948, 1967 and 1973, when combined Arab forces tried but failed to defeat Israel.

However, recent events in Jerusalem suggest that the United States could influence policy-making if it wanted to.

A review of city planning activity shows that between March 9 and November 1 in 2010 there was a de facto halt on settlement work in the city and again from January 3, 2012 to early April.

The first period coincided with intense U.S. lobbying for a freeze to entice the Palestinian leadership into peace talks - negotiations that swiftly broke down when Netanyahu rejected Palestinian demands for a further extension to the halt.

There is no clear explanation for the second period of inactivity, although some diplomats have suggested Netanyahu applied the brake to avoid rows with Washington as he sought to gain U.S. support for a tough stance on Iran's nuclear strategy.

"Israel failed to get the green light from America to attack Iran. Shortly afterwards the building plans for Jerusalem accelerated. Who knows if these two facts are connected?" said a senior Western diplomat in Israel who declined to be named.

Israeli officials said the apparent freeze was coincidental.

Municipal leaders complain openly about the outside pressure that is brought to bear as they seek to run one of the world's iconic cities, administering garbage collection, school buses and restaurant permits, while welcoming in the tourist hordes.

"Everything stood still for quite a few months but from the point of view of the city's various populations it was tragic," says Deputy Mayor Naomi Tsur, adding that the order in 2010 to stop work had come directly from Netanyahu.

"This is a living city. People have to live somewhere, send their children to schools," she said. "When we are left to ourselves we know how to do it, but we are not left to ourselves."

With peace talks blocked and world attention fixed on myriad other crises, the floodgates have lifted and the city authorities seem to have a free hand to do what they want.

Out in Givat HaMatos, the bulldozers could swing into action by the autumn, when the summer heat starts to fade.

"The geography and demographics will then be so Balkanised that the two-state solution will be gone," said Seidemann.

"All the analysts we have met in the intelligence community in Europe and the United States, including the White House, see it and know it is coming."

World War III: Satanic International Banksters in Washington and London Sacrificing Israel, Iran and America

Israel Will Commit Suicide By Attacking Iran (and Allow the Globalists to Pick Up the Pieces)

By Saman Mohammadi, The Excavator Blog
February 11, 2012

In the last six months, tensions have risen between Israel and Iran. Israel has assassinated numerous Iranian nuclear scientists and Iranian military officials, including the founder of Iran’s missile program, Major General Hassan Moghaddam.

So far, Iran has not retaliated against Israel’s repeated acts of aggression and terrorism. But the spirit of revenge is alive in Tehran. While it is hard to tell what kind of manifestation Iran’s spiritual anger will take, everyone realizes that a retaliation is in order and completely justified.

Throughout Israel’s campaign of terror and provocations against Iran, the Obama administration has remained in the background, quietly minding its own business.

Washington’s compliance towards Israel has puzzled and aggravated many people, including world leaders who believe the time has come to get tough with Israel. Anyone who is paying the least bit of attention to statements on Israel and Iran by U.S. government officials know they are contradictory and anti-reality.

American author and journalist Mark Perry, who made serious waves in the Israel-Iran debate last month with his piece in Foreign Policy called, ‘False Flag,’ says that official U.S. government statements are written for a number of domestic and foreign audiences. So when Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told CBS’ Face The Nation last month that Iran is not building a nuclear bomb, he wanted to reassure Iranian leaders that things are under control in Washington and that the crazies are not totally guiding America’s Iran policy.

As far as words go, the Obama administration has proven that it can pull off the high-wire act of balancing U.S. interests and Israel’s ambitions. But this is a deadly game that Washington is playing. President Obama is gambling with the lives of Americans and citizens around the world.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, said that President Obama should make a public statement in which he warns Iran against raising tensions and guarantees that America will not attack Iran or allow any attack to take place. This move would isolate an already weakened Israel and force its lunatic leaders to reflect on its current terrorist strategy towards Iran and rethink Israel’s overall Middle East policy.

Brzezinski offered his advice to President Obama and top administration officials on the Chris Matthews show on February 3, 2012. Here is the exchange between Matthews and Brzezinski:

Matthews: Is there something that could be worse than Iran having a weapon. In other words, when you make the calculation on consequences, is there any way you would decide ‘Well, alright, we can live with a nuclear weapon in the hands of the Iranians’ because it’s better than what?

Brzezinski: The answer is very simple: war. Because it’s very easy to start a war, it’s very difficult to end it on your own terms. And it tends to produce unforeseen consequences.

Look, the Israelis have the so-called nuclear deterrent. We have an enormous nuclear deterrent. The notion that somehow or other the Iranians, who have existed for three thousand years, are going to commit public suicide the first moment they have a bomb is really ludicrous.

Gary Sick, who is a major significant expert on Iran, has produced a list since 1994 of annual Israeli predictions that next year Iran will have the bomb. So I think we can take their predictions with a little bit of caution.

Moreover, their public opinion is not first strike. The majority of American Jews are not first strike. . .I think we’re dealing here with a right-wing government with rather one-sided notions of what security is, and perhaps with a somewhat irresponsible attitude about the consequences of their actions for us.

Because the Iranians, if attacked, are not going to retaliate effectively against Israel because they can not. They’ll retaliate against us because they’ll see us as the sponsors. So, our troops in Afghanistan will pay the price and our disengagement may become very difficult to pursue. We’ll have a mess in Iraq again. There could be difficulties in the Persian Gulf. The price of oil could go up. The global economy could be hurt. American taxpayers will pay five bucks per gallon. The consequences for us could be extremely serious.

Matthews: But Dr. Brzezinski, can Israel survive if it’s known by its own people it protects, perhaps future immigrants to Israel, that they’re going into a country that’s under a basically a firing zone from Iran, that any moment one of the Mullahs could decide to attack, maybe irrationally.

Brzezinski: Look, we lived in that situation for several decades, with an enemy who could wipe out much of America in a few minutes.

They don’t have the bomb yet. We’re negotiating with them. I think part of the Israelis’ concern is that we may make an arrangement with the Iranians that doesn’t humiliate them, and doesn’t force them to capitulate totally.

Matthews: What’s in U.S. interest?

Brzezinski: I think in the U.S. interest it is absolutely imperative that Israel be secure, but in a Middle East which is not at war. And we can accomplish that. We can first of all issue a public statement that any threat by Iran against any state in the Middle East will be viewed as a threat against us. That in itself would be a very major deterrent. And I think we can at the same time continue negotiating with Iranians perhaps about some arrangement in which they’ll continue their nuclear program but under effective international inspection. And some progress is moving in that direction.

Matthews: How do you save their pride?

Brzezinski: Well, by agreeing to them having a nuclear program.

Matthews: It’s not weaponized?

Brzezinski: It’s not weaponized. The enrichment is not up to a certain level that really represents a danger.

Matthews: Okay, what does Israel get out of that deal? Do they get a year or two or three years of safety?

Brzezinski: Look, if they have a guarantee from the United States they have as much safety as Western Europe, or as Japan, or as South Korea. I think we can do it. But we have to be forthright. And our president and secretary of defense also have to speak forthrightly about this and make it clear we do not want that war, it’s in nobody’s interest.

If Brzezinski’s narrative—that Israel is pulling and dragging America into a war with unpredictable consequences that it does not want—is correct and true then that makes Israel the clear villain in this global drama.

So according to this narrative, America = the subservient dog in the house; and Israel = the rogue wild wolf on the frontier.

But is this the reality, or is it clever CIA/Pentagon propaganda?

The biggest question on the minds of the people of the world is not will a vilified and isolated Israel attack Iran, but, does Israel control Washington, or does Washington control Israel? And by Washington I mean the globalist new world order terrorists in the CIA and the Pentagon who were behind 9/11, and the assassination of JFK.

Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad raised this question back in August 2010 when he challenged President Obama to a live television debate. He said:

“Somebody should answer questions whether the US government is dominated by the Zionists or the Zionist regime is controlled by the US government.”

Journalist and author Russ Baker rejects the popular notion that Israel is leading a bewildered Pentagon over the cliff of Armageddon by attacking Iran. In his article, “Is Israel Really Iran’s Main Adversary? The West Doth Protest Too Much,” Baker writes:

“History, and current pressures on the Pentagon to justify its budget in a time of austerity, suggest that the Pentagon is not really opposed to an attack on Iran, only very shrewdly letting someone else get the music started.Make Israel the villain. If there’s one thing that the Left relates to even more than suspicion of the Pentagon: it’s default vilification of Israel as the world’s leading lone wolf miscreant.”

Baker is right.

I’ve come to the conclusion that the Pentagon, CIA, and MI6 are letting Israel and the Zionists take the blame for the coming global war.

The two staged events that started this world war–the Iranian Islamic Revolution and the 9/11 attacks–were both the products of the shadow CIA and MI6 that exist separately within the official CIA and MI6.

See: Asian Secret Societies (the Dragon Family) Want Their Gold Back; the Western Secret Societies Blew Up the World Trade Center So That They Wouldn't Have to Give It Back

See: The Church Will Be 'Raptured' at Armageddon

See: Iran-Russia-China Military Alliance: Russia and China Will Not Stand Idly By If Iran Is Attacked

See: World War III, the Rise of the Anti-Christian One-world Government and Religion, and the Abomination of Desolation

Mossad is only a secondary actor in this game.

I’m not vilifying Israel because it wasn’t Israel that put Khomeini and Islamic radicals in power in Iran in 1979 who cause unnecessary trouble by describing the Israeli government as the “regime occupying Jerusalem.” I’m not vilifying Israel because it wasn’t Israel that staged the hostage crisis in Iran after the Islamic revolution. Both of those manufactured events were engineered by shadow CIA-MI6 operatives and their well-placed friends in Iran’s intelligence and security services. The facts prove it.

But they want us to blame Israel. Why? Because the globalist architects and cultural programmers who want to create a clash of civilizations need a scapegoat. And they tell themselves: who better to blame than the historically persecuted and ancient Jewish people? They expect people to dump their hate and anger on Israel, and absolve the globalist rascals in Washington and London of their sins. Well, I’m not buying it, and neither should you.

World War III isn’t about Israel against the world.

World War II isn’t about Israel provoking an unwanted conflict with Iran and dragging a reluctant Pentagon for the wild ride.

World War III is about the Satanic international banksters and globalist nuclear terrorists in Washington and London sacrificing all three nations involved in the conflict: Israel, Iran, and America.

Let’s not be blinded by anti-Semitism. Let’s not overlook the fact that the globalist genocidal mass murderers who control the CIA, MI6, and Pentagon have plotted a third world war between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Israel since the Soviet Union collapsed, and probably even before then.

Trusting the CIA, MI6, and Pentagon more than the Mossad is a very risky gamble. History shows we would be foolish to take this risk. The narrative the CIA/Pentagon propaganda machine is putting out makes Israel the sole bad guy and abstains them from the guilt and shame of being the murderers behind World War Three and Nuclear Armageddon.

This fractured narrative blurs the truth and shields the globalist terrorists from public wrath. If we are to believe the CIA and Pentagon, Israel and Iran are the demonic villains, and America is the reluctant but stern warrior and international steward of the Persian Gulf and global economy. It is very sweet and touching. Very Hollywoodesque.

This is how the CIA/Pentagon plot reads: Israel and Iran create a huge mess that pulls in America after it decided to leave Iraq and Afghanistan, two newly created democracies. Once again, the blood of Americans must be spilled to resolve the crisis, bring the two parties to the table, and create a lasting peace in the Middle East.

And this is the planned global popular reaction to the telling of this mythical tale: Wow. The U.S. military is so impressive. America is so heroic. Washington is saving civilization. What wonderful people are Pentagon generals and CIA officers. May their hearts be blessed. May they continue to teach the Jews and the Persians how to live together in peace. We hope they never leave the Middle East because their wisdom, maturity, and grace will always be needed in this region of the world.

If only it were true.

If only Pentagon generals and CIA officers weren’t cold-blooded bastards and traitors who would kill an American president in an instant if he crossed their interests.

If only Pentagon generals and CIA officers didn’t write documents like Operation Northwoods that say staging false flag attacks in the United States is okay.

If only the mass murderers and terrorists were in Tel Aviv and nowhere else. But life isn’t that simple.

You can believe in the myth that Israel is the only villain in this drama all you want. In the real world, however, the biggest mass murderers and liars are in London and Washington, not Tel Aviv. They started World War III on September 11, 2001, because they want to destroy America, Israel, Iran, and every nation so they can rule Earth with a global fascist government.

See: Banking Cartel Is the New World Order

See: IMF and the World Bank

See: Battle Over the Temple Mount in Jerusalem

See: Obama Favors Arab Sovereignty Over the Temple Mount

See: The Chronological Order of the Book of Revelation

See: Drones and the End Times

See: Corporate Takeover of America

See: Elite Ruling Class Owns the Governments of the World

See: Final Global Empire Will Arise

See: Fourth Beast Kingdom Which is Yet to Come

See: We Are on the Road to World War III

See: New World Order Is Upon Us

See: Illuminati Meeting at Bohemian Grove July 16 - July 17, 2011

See: NWO Order Plans Exposed by Insider in 1969: One World Government Under the Devil Without Liberty or Justice for All

See: Obama: New World Order Puppet

See: Obama, the Illuminati, and the Zionist Agenda

See: Zionism vs. Peace in the Middle East

Russia Says It Would Never Support a U.N. Resolution Imposing Economic Sanctions on Iran

Bible prophecy describes a coalition of nations that will almost certainly include China and Russia and several other Muslim nations of the Middle East. The Euphrates originates in Turkey, and flows through Syria and Iraq; then it converges with the Tigris River, which then borders Iran. Anyone who hears the daily news should know that these four nations are extremely volatile trouble spots for military conflicts nowadays. The prophecies even imply that the nation of Iraq, once controlled by the regime of Saddam Hussein, will be a notable part of this final showdown. The population of these countries today is: Turkey -- 77 million; Syria -- 19.4 million; Iraq -- 29 million; Iran -- 70 million. The total population of that region is 195.4 million. Obviously, a 200-million-man army cannot come from these nations alone. In the light of China's cooperation with Iran and Syria (both openly and covertly), it appears to be fairly certain that China will league with Iran and Syria, somehow engaging Iraq and Turkey as well, to attempt to defeat Israel and the West. Their rabid anti-Zionism, anti-American hatred will not die, but will escalate into the worst conflagration in the history of human conflicts. Every day, the evidence mounts that China will be tightly leagued with Russia and many of the Islamic nations in a powerful new anti-Israel political and military alliance from which this 200-million-man army will ultimately come. - The Church Will Be 'Raptured' at Armageddon

Russia Asserting Itself Against West, This Time Over Syria Regime Change

The Washington Post
January 28, 2012

With the United States and its allies pressing President Bashar al-Assad to step down, the Arab League last week issued a detailed plan for a political transition in Syria. The plan was welcomed by the Obama administration, and Arab leaders quickly said they would refer it to the United Nations.

And a day later, Russia had its say: Not a chance.

“This is an effort from the Arab League, if I understand correctly, to sort of already put a precooked solution on the table,” said Vitaly I. Churkin, Moscow’s envoy to the United Nations. “I understand that the attitude of Damascus to that has been negative.”

The response doomed any hope of a quick resolution at the United Nations to bring greater pressure to bear on the Syrian government, but it also fell into a familiar pattern by which Moscow has shown a growing willingness to challenge the United States and its European partners on a range of issues.

In recent weeks, Moscow has sought U.N. scrutiny of possible crimes by NATO during its air campaign in Libya, and even called for investigations into organ sales in Kosovo, a close ally of the West. Most notably, Moscow has obstructed any effort to increase pressure on Iran. Asked in an interview whether Russia would ever support a U.N. resolution imposing economic sanctions on the Islamic republic, Churkin said:

“No chance, no chance, no chance. . . . Ever.”

Critics say Moscow’s tough line at the United Nations reflects what one senior council diplomat described as “the Putinization of Russian foreign policy,” on the eve of what many expect will be the return of Vladimir Putin to the presidency. Other analysts say Russia is trying to reassert its authority in the council following a period in which the United States and Europe prevailed in the handling of several major crises, engineering the downfall of former Ivory Coast leader Laurent Gbagbo and, more recently, of Moammar Gaddafi in Libya.

“The Russians looked diminished in the first half of 2011, and the strategy is to show, one, they are prepared to act as a spoiler, but, two, they can also lay out a more proactive agenda,” said Richard Gowan, an expert on the United Nations at the New York University Center for International Cooperation.

The United States and its European partners have responded to Russian aims by mounting a campaign to isolate it at the United Nations, and portraying Moscow as an obstacle to the democratic changes sweeping through the Middle East.

This past week, for example, the United States, Britain, Germany and France publicly rebuked Syria’s arms suppliers, a veiled reference to Russia, for continuing to sell weapons to Damascus.

“It is glaringly obvious that transferring weapons into a volatile and violent situation is irresponsible and will only fuel the bloodshed,” Britain’s U.N. envoy, Mark Lyall Grant, told the Security Council.

Russia is coming under mounting pressure to break with Assad from the Arab League, which is sending a delegation to the Security Council on Tuesday to press its case for a political transition that would require that the Syrian leader step aside. Meanwhile, Morocco, acting on behalf of a group of Western and Arab governments, has introduced a draft resolution endorsing the Arab League initiative calling on states to follow the Arab organization’s example by imposing sanctions on Syria. The Russians have responded coolly.

The high-level diplomatic gamesmanship is playing out as violence continues to spiral in Syria, forcing the United States to prepare for the possible closure of its embassy and the evacuation of its diplomatic personnel. U.N. officials estimate that more than 5,400 civilians have been killed, mostly at the hands of government security forces, since protesters took to the streets earlier last year.

Russia’s stance underscores the strength and depth of its relationship with Assad’s regime, which is not only a recipient of Russian arms but also host of a Russian naval base. The crisis in Syria also has provided Moscow with an opportunity to show it is a more reliable ally than Western powers, particularly the United States, which is seen by many in the region as having abandoned one of its closest allies, former Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak.

“If you have good relations with a country, a government for years, for decades, then it’s not so easy to ditch those politicians and those governments because of political expediency,” Churkin said. “We are stronger on our allegiances than others.”

Tensions between the West and Russia have spilled over into a series of highly personal attacks at the United Nations. Last month, U.S. Ambassador Susan E. Rice derided Churkin’s appeal for a new probe into possible NATO killings as a “cheap stunt” aimed at distracting attention from the killing in Syria.

Churkin fired back at the Stanford-educated envoy, saying,

“Really this Stanford dictionary of expletives must be replaced by something more Victorian.”

Rice’s media spokesman posted a tweet with a photoshopped picture of Churkin on the head of “the Grinch Who Stole Christmas.”

Asked if he was trying to change the subject from Syria, Churkin acknowledged that the Security Council has been the scene of “games of distraction,” but he said Russia’s concerns about the Libya mission were legitimate, asserting that the killing of civilians during the NATO campaign was “a real issue.”

Russia, along with Brazil, China, India and South Africa, believe “it would be extremely dangerous if” the West continues to be “carried away by this regime-change idea,” he said.

In Syria, Russia has pursued a complicated diplomatic strategy to shore up the regime, joining China in vetoing the Western-backed resolution threatening sanctions against Damascus, and introducing its own resolution. That resolution, now stalled, sought to focus the Security Council’s energy on backing a political settlement between the Syrian government and the opposition, and cutting off military supplies to the opposition.

Under the resolution, Assad’s army could still be armed.

Asked if Russia’s ongoing arms sales to Assad’s government were perhaps undercutting his government’s effort to pursue a political settlement, Churkin said:

“We are not doing anything which is contrary to international law. Other than that, we don’t have to give any explanation to anybody.”

U.S. Military Refuses to Drive Bilderberg Israeli Bus Off Cliff into WWIII

U.S. Military Refuses to Drive Bilderberg Israeli Bus Off Cliff into WW III

www.911insidejob.com
January 25, 2012

I deliberately use words that will trigger computer key word searches by the military and US Intelligence Services. This is one of those posts.

I deal in reality. If you want to hear fantasies about Iran’s nuclear weapons program that does not exist, you will have to go to a news outlet that either takes money from the Federal Reserve or is owned by Zionists and arms manufacturers. There is no evidence that Iran has an active program to make nuclear weapons. The Iranians are at 20% enrichment which is enough to make medical isotopes. They need to get to over 90% to make a bomb.

Yet we have heard nothing but war talk against Iran ever since the invasion of Iraq. We spent a trillion dollars and lots of lives fighting in Iraq over WMDs we knew never existed even before we invaded. We spent over a trillion dollars fighting in Afghanistan because the Taliban refused to turn over Osama bin Laden without evidence that he was responsible for 911. The US refused to produce any evidence of Osama’s crimes because there was none. But there is overwhelming evidence that Israel did 911 which I will demonstrate in my next essay.

So if the Iraqi WMDs were a fantasy cooked up by the Israelis to trick Americans into killing millions of Muslims in Iraq and Israel did 911 so there was no reason to kill millions of Muslims in Afghanistan, why is the Jewish owned media talking about attacking Iran which means war with Syria and Hezbollah as well? And what was it with those drone attacks and car bombs the CIA unleashed against Pakistan? I thought Pakistan was one of America’s best friends in the world.

As I said before, I deal in reality. Israel has laid claim to all the land from the Nile to the Euphrates which has an area the size of Texas and a population of 300 million. In 2001 just after 911 Wesley Clark saw a list of 7 nations Bush had told the Pentagon to invade. The list included Libya, Lebanon, Sudan, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Iran. It was based upon Oded Yinon’s 1982 A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties. The only reason for all of America’s wars is Israel and her insane idea that she has the right to dispossess 300 million people from their land. America spent trillions of dollars and ten years fighting people who were only guilty of resisting invasions and occupations that killed millions of innocent civilians. You might ask where the honor is in killing unarmed women and children.

All that fighting and dying and all those sacrifices by families back home were to no avail. When the US officially left Iraq on December 15, 2011, she left behind lots of cancer and birth defect inducing Depleted Uranium and lots of death squads to teach those Muslims to love Wall Street democracy. The US is now negotiating an exit from Afghanistan with the Taliban in Qatar. Things have not gone well on the Afghan front ever since the Pakistan Army cut off American supplies. This was after the deliberate and unprovoked murder of 24 Pakistani soldiers on November 26th.

So you ask just how do the Israelis plan to get from here to there? They want to dispossess 300 million Muslims and America failed at that task. But the US military will succeed in doing exactly what Israel wants if they attack Iran.

Israel wants US sailors, marines, soldiers and airmen to die.

The Israelis know that Iran has sufficient guided missiles with fuel air explosives to destroy every Air Force, Marine and Army base in US Central Command within minutes. They know that Iran also has sufficient anti-ship missiles and supercavitating high speed torpedoes to sink the entire Persian Gulf fleet in minutes. The Israelis know the flight time to Iran is so long that the first ten thousand of those 150,000 incoming missiles would already begin the obliteration of Israel long before their 100 jets drop some bombs and returned home. That is not a real plan. So what is their real plan?

The only plan that makes military sense is to get the Iranians to destroy US Central Command and sink the US Persian Gulf fleet while Israel launches a preemptive nuclear strike against Lebanon, Syria and Iran. That way the American military is permanently degraded along with its economy. Then the United States would become an impoverished vassal state for Israel supplying their Zionist masters with mad dog killers willing to torture and commit war crimes. But, if you think about it, that is the function America has already been fulfilling for some time in the eyes of Israel.

Let’s move onto the Bilderberg Society which owns the banks that have stolen tens of trillions of dollars from Americans. They also want America to lose World War III. If America loses the next big war, then its once free citizens will become permanent Debt Slaves incapable of seizing even part of the money stolen from them. That is why the Bilderbergers had their puppets pass the North American Free Trade Act in 1994. They wanted to send 50,000 American manufacturing plants and all those high paying jobs overseas so our supply lines would stretch 8,000 miles on a dodgy credit card to China.

The Zionists want America to lose World War III for Israel and for the Rothschild banking network. The Bilderbergers and the Israelis have all their power because they steal billions of dollars every week from US federal spending they do not let the lowly Americans audit. They have that right because they give less than 1% of the money they stole as bribes to politicians in the two political parties they permit Americans to have. This two party corruption gives the voters the illusion of democracy. It was those same bribes that allowed banks to foreclose on millions of Americans dispossessing them just as the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians.

Israel is eager to launch World War III by attacking Iran because the bankers and the Israelis do not want Americans to live long enough as a free people to catch on to just how much contempt they have for the Goyim of America and Palestine. Israel did 911 more than ten years ago and still there has been no price paid for betrayal. The Israelis and Bilderbergers need a war to shut down all those people talking about bankers stealing trillions and Israel doing 911.

So tell me again why the American enlisted men who have risked their lives on 6, 7 and 8 combat tours should eagerly commit suicide in the Persian Gulf for a nation that holds them in contempt and mocks God and His laws? So tell me why officers who have men and women in their command die in combat and 8 times that many die at their own hands because the politicians who took those Bilderberg and Israeli bribes actively despise the returning vets. Those men and women are dying from Depleted Uranium and experimental vaccines. It is illegal to administer to serial killers on death row what is routinely forced upon our troops. America’s military has been fighting No Win wars for a very long time because that is the way the Bilderbergers and the Israelis demand it be.

But this need not be. There is a future other than the one the Rothschilds planned for you. The US military can refuse to drive that Bilderberg Israeli bus off a cliff into World War III and the pits of hell.

The military can and will say No rather than die killing themselves and a few billion innocent human beings.

Iran Prepares for War

The threat made by Iran’s leadership to close off the Strait of Hormuz is a provocation intended to bring about a confrontation between Iran and the US, Saudia Arabia, Bahrain and other Western nations. We must be prepared for this inevitability… In Reza Kahlili’s most recent article “The Coming War with Iran” he goes into details…Here’s hoping the Obama Administration heeds this warning - JanSuzanne

The Coming War with Iran

By Reza Kahlili, A Time to Betray
December 29, 2011

Iran’s tyrannical leaders, determined to make the Islamic regime a nuclear-armed state, are preparing for war. That’s exactly what the United States and Israel might have to deliver, and soon. @-Text.rag:Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei ordered the Revolutionary Guards in May to speed up the regime’s nuclear-bomb program and arm its missiles with nuclear warheads. Now, sources reveal, Ayatollah Khamenei has ordered the guards to prepare for war.

In a recent meeting of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, it was decided that the possibility of an attack by Israel or America in 2012 is real and that the country’s forces need to prepare several contingencies for war. It also was concluded that in case of war, the regime could be victorious, though the cost would be high, but it would emerge as the one and only champion of the Islamic cause in the world.

The radicals ruling Iran have long believed that obtaining the nuclear bomb will make them untouchable and will facilitate the expansion of the Islamic movement in the region and the world in bringing the West to its knees. They also have concluded that because of the troubles in the world’s economy and financial troubles in America, even a limited confrontation with America would benefit the Islamic regime.

Just as Hezbollah outfought Israel in the 2006 war, Iran can claim victory against the U.S. in such a conflict, which could include attacking Israel from several fronts. But the real prize for the criminal mullahs would be that it would help the regime bring down the monarchy in Bahrain, create instability in Saudi Arabia and, most important, help the Islamists in Egypt undermine military rule. All this would occur by inciting uprisings for a war of Islam against infidels and Zionists.

The guards in their preparations have mapped out several options. One would be to disrupt the oil flow from the Persian Gulf. They know that about 40 percent of the world’s oil and the majority of oil exports of eight countries in the Persian Gulf pass through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway that could be blocked by the regime’s forces.

The guards’ navy of speedboats armed with cruise missiles, Iran’s submarines and, most important, the guards’ missiles of various kinds could be launched from deep within Iran and still target the narrow strait.

The guards also have mapped out an extensive list of U.S. bases in the Middle East to attack with their missiles, disrupting the movement of U.S. forces and the operation of the Air Force, which the guards believe will be the main thrust of any attack by America.

For that purpose, several U.S. bases have been identified that could be attacked either by short-range rockets with a range of up to 140 miles or with ballistic missiles with a range of more than 1,250 miles. The two air bases in Kuwait, Ali Al Salem and Ahmed Al Jaber, are less than 85 miles from Iran. In Kuwait, the U.S. camps of Buehring, Spearhead, Patriot and Arifjan, with distances of 65 to 80 miles, are all within reach of the guards’ various missiles.

The guards also are targeting four U.S. air bases in Afghanistan as the main launching pads for any attacks on Iran. The Bagram Air Base, home to most of the U.S. Air Force presence in Afghanistan, is just 450 miles from the Iranian borders and within range of all of Iran’s ballistic missiles. Other air bases in Afghanistan that would be attacked by the guards in case of war are in Kandahar, Shindand and Herat.

The super U.S. base, Al Adid in Qatar, which is home to a variety of U.S. bombers and fighters, is within 175 miles of Iran and a prime target for the guards, though because of favorable relations of the Islamic regime with the government in Qatar, the guards are not sure America can use that air base for its attack and therefore will be much more likely to use its other superbase at Al Dhafra in the United Arab Emirates, also within range of various Iranian missiles. Other U.S. targets of the guards are the U.S. 5th Fleet in Bahrain and Thumrait Air Base in Oman.

The guards also have drawn up plans to confront any uprising from within should one occur after the breakout of war and have mobilized tens of thousands of Basijis ready to put down any unrest against the regime.

The Islamic regime in Iran also counts on Russia and China, with which it has close relations, to come to its help and facilitate an end to war in time to save the regime. China, which holds billions of dollars in contracts and is said to have more than 11,000 contractors, mostly of a military nature, in Iran, has the most to lose in the downfall of the Islamic regime, and its officials already have stated openly that China will aid the Iranian regime in case of war.

Though the Islamic regime never should have been allowed to continue with its suppression of its people, its terrorist activities worldwide and its continuation of its missile and nuclear programs despite U.N. sanctions, one cannot imagine a world with nuclear arms in the hands of the jihadists in Iran.

With officials from both Israel and the U.S. calling a nuclear-armed Iran a red line, leaving the possibility of a military option on the table, we must realize that the only possible solution to this dilemma is a regime change in Iran, which a majority of Iranians support. The price we pay today to save world peace and security will be minuscule to what the world will pay in the not-so-distant future.

Reza Kahlili is a pseudonym for a former CIA operative in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and the author of “A Time to Betray” (Threshhold Editions, Simon & Schuster, 2010) He is a fellow with EMPact America and teaches at the U.S. Department of Defense’s Joint Counterintelligence Training Academy (JCITA).

Israel's Unsustainable Politics of Exclusion in Jerusalem

Politics and Religion: Israel's Unsustainable Politics of Exclusion in Jerusalem

By Nicola Nasser, Global Research
December 31, 2011

While the history of the world is moving decisively toward a culture of inclusion, diversity and pluralism, Israeli politics seems to challenge history by moving in the opposite direction of exclusion and unilateral self - righteous monopoly of geography, demography, history, archeology and culture, especially in Jerusalem, where Israelis are desperately trying to establish a “Jewish” capital for Israel and “the Jewish people” worldwide, excluding centuries old presence of Palestinian, Arab, Muslim and Christian deep-rooted existence and heritage, thus sowing the seeds of imminent conflict and foreseeable war by strangling a city that has historically been of diversified and pluralistic character and a flashpoint for human misery whenever exclusion becomes the rule of the day.

Israeli politics is not moving against history only, but is challenging world politics as well. Although the first Knesset of the newly born “state of Israel” voted on December 13, 1949 to move the seat of government from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and despite Israel’s annexation of east Jerusalem on June 27, 1967, which the UN Security Council declared “null and void,” both unilateral declarations have never been accepted and recognized by the international community, not even by the U.S., Israel’s strategic guardian.

More recently, while millions of Christians were celebrating the birth of Jesus Christ in Bethlehem, on the southern outskirts of Jerusalem, and the birth of Christianity in Jerusalem, the scene of Jesus’ resurrection following his death by crucifixion, which is the cornerstone of Christian faith, the Knesset was, on Christmas day, scheduled to consider a draft law that would declare Jerusalem “the capital of the Jewish people” and the capital of Israel at the same time.

The fact that the ruling elite in Tel Aviv has made a prior recognition of Israel as a “Jewish” state a precondition for making peace implicitly and consequently applies to Christians as well, otherwise how could any observer interpret the still simmering crisis with the Vatican over the holy places in Jerusalem. The “Fundamental Agreement” signed by both sides on December 30, 1993, as well as an agreement on the recognition of the civil effects of ecclesiastical legal personality, signed on November 10, 1997, have yet to be ratified by Israel's Knesset. Some in the Israeli media has been recently accusing the Vatican of seeking to hold control of “Jewish holy sites” in Jerusalem .

The Vatican in the past supported making Jerusalem a corpus separatum, an international city in accordance with the UN Resolution 181 of 1947; Israel’s non-compliance delayed Vatican’s formal recognition of Israel until 1993.

More recently, the Vatican renewed calls for an internal agreement to protect the holy places in Jerusalem. Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, head of the Vatican ’s Council for Inter-religious Dialogue, and Vatican ’s former foreign minister, declared

“There will not be peace if the question of the holy sites is not adequately resolved. The part of Jerusalem within the walls – with the holy sites of the three religions – is humanity’s heritage. The sacred and unique character of the area must be safeguarded and it can only be done with a special, internationally-guaranteed statute.”

The only perceived threat to the holy places against which the Vatican is seeking protection comes from the Israeli politics of exclusion. Rabbi David Rosen, member of the Israeli delegation to the negotiations with the Vatican told the Israeli daily Haaretz on January 17, 2010 that Israel “has not been faithful to the pacts of 1993.”

The precondition of recognizing Israel as a “Jewish state” is rejected by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), Israel’s partner in peace accords, and its self-ruled Palestinian Authority, the 22-member League of Arab States and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC); in a statement he issued on December 26, 2011, the Secretary-General of the 57-member states of the OIC, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, condemned the Israeli draft law that declares Jerusalem “the capital of Israel and the Jewish people” as “a direct assault on the Palestinian people and their inalienable and clear rights” and “a flagrant violation of international law and international legitimacy resolutions,” which affirm that Jerusalem is part of the Palestinian territories occupied by Israel in 1967. PLO representatives considered the Israeli draft law a “declaration of war” and a recipe for igniting a religious conflict. The Islamic – Christian Commission in Support of Jerusalem , in a statement, said if the Israeli draft law is passed it would make Jerusalem “for Judaism and Jews only, which means there would be no freedom of worship in the land of worship.”

Israeli attorney and founder of Terrestrial Jerusalem, a Jerusalem-based NGO, Daniel Seidemann, wrote on November 30, 2011:

“Cumulatively, Israeli policies in East Jerusalem today threaten to transform the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from a bitter national conflict that can be resolved by means of territorial compromise, into the potential for a bloody, unsolvable religious war. This threat derives from Israel 's dogged pursuit of the settlers' vision of an exclusionary Jewish Jerusalem.”

“… Today, Israel must choose between two visions of Jerusalem . On the one hand, it can continue pursuing an exclusive, largely fictitious rule over an already divided, bi-national city -- exposing Israel to virtually universal censure and imperiling the two-state solution. On the other hand, it can pursue policies that can make Israeli Jerusalem, Yerushalayim, a thriving national capital, recognized by all, existing side-by-side with but politically divided from the Palestinian capital in Jerusalem , al Quds. To those who cherish Israel and understand what is truly at stake, the choice is clear,” Seidemann concluded.

What is much more important than excluding “a conflict that can be resolved by means of territorial compromise,” is that the Israeli politics of exclusion in Jerusalem, which could be summarized by Judaization of the holy city, is a roadmap to de-Arabizing, de-Islamizing, de-Christianizing, de-historizing and de-humanizing Jerusalem, the oldest continuously inhabited city in the world, and this could not be anything but a roadmap to hell.

Absolutely this is unsustainable Israeli politics.

Nicola Nasser is a veteran Arab journalist based in Bir Zeit, West Bank of the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories. * nassernicola@ymail.com

U.S. Pays for Zionist-oriented Policies

Perry is the perfect choice for the neocons because, as Rogin notes, he has stated that his “faith requires me to support Israel.” He believes that the Obama administration is “out of tune with America” on the question of Israel. In 2009, Perry received the “Defender of Jerusalem Award.” Rick Perry, despite his flaccid Tea Party and secessionist rhetoric, is the ideal candidate for the neocons and their global elite taskmasters. If nominated – and this is a distinct possibility – and elected as chief teleprompter reader, he will bring back neocon chest-pounding to the establishment political scene. As Obama has demonstrated, the agenda does not change. Only the rhetoric is slightly modified every four or eight years as the establishment shuffles the deck and the game of musical chairs continues uninterrupted. - Kurt Nimmo, Rick Perry is the Neocon Warmonger Choice for President, Infowars.com, August 12, 2011

U.S. Pays for Zionist-oriented Policies

By Sajjad Shaukat, News Center PK
July 29, 2011

Renowned political thinker, Morgenthau and others agree that a number of internal factors like population, system of government, geographical location, economic out etc. play a key role in formulating the foreign policy of a country. But this thesis is quite opposite to the United States where the Zionist Jews shape the internal policies of the country, while moulding American external policy in accordance with their own interests.

Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney pointed outs,

“It is long been clear that the pro-Israel, ultra-Zionist network of think tanks, public policy organizations, media outlets, and lobbying organizations which have absolute control over the United States Congress, executive branch and foreign policy, actually run the US government…politicians who do not submit to the Zionist agenda are not elected or appointed to serve the government. We know that no government can serve two masters, and as a result, we have seen Israeli priorities placed above those of the American people.”

McKinney explains,

“The idea that our leaders are intent on pursuing America’s vital national interests abroad–is a myth. What is up is the Israelis have a singularly powerful lobby in the US, which wields such political clout that no politician can afford to cross them. We are living in a country where the chief executive must worry that Congress will support the position of a foreign leader over the President of the United States…the pro-Israel movement in the US, a well-organized political machine that operates as the Israeli government’s agent in America…a fifth column in league with a foreign government–so powerful that it has become the decisive factor in determining US policy.”

In fact, Jews are owners of the many big cartels of the US in particular and the world in general. Based in the US, by running the major multinational corporations, arms factories, five star hotels, oil companies, liquor business, banks, film industry, print and electronic media on international level—having influence on the financial institutes like World Bank and International Monetary Fund, Jews have direct and indirect hold on the global economy. Thus by dominating the American internal policies, Zionist Jews mould country’s foreign policy for their own interests.

It is due to the dominance of Zionists over America that the September 11 tragedy was fully manipulated by Israel and Jews who had joined the Bush’s war against terrorism so as to target Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan and Iran in particular and other Muslim countries in general. For this purpose, Jews also got the services of some Hindus to continue their anti-Muslim campaign. In this regard, by availing the international phenomena of terrorism, Jewish-Hindu lobbies are collectively working in America and other European countries to exploit the double standards of the US-led west regarding terrorism and human rights vis-à-vis Pakistan, Iran and China including Syria, Libya, Yemen, Egypt etc. in wake of the violent uprising in these Middle East states.

Particularly Israel and India are equating the ‘war of independence’ in Kashmir and Palestine with terrorism. And New Delhi considers Pakistan as its enemy number one, while Tel Aviv takes Iran in the same sense owing to its nuclear programme. Israel is also against Pakistan as it is the only nuclear Islamic country.

Notably, Israeli Mossad which is well-penetrated in the American CIA is in collusion with Indian RAW. These secret agencies have introduced dangerous socio-religious elements in American and other western societies by equating the “war on terror” with “war on Islam” and Al Qaeda’s acts with all the Muslims—contributed to re-shape the global politics on cultural and religious lines with the negative projection of Islam.

As the US has been compelled to follow the Zionist policies, therefore, in a prolonged war of more than ten years, despite torturing the Muslims in Guantanamo Bay, Abu Graid, and other similar camps, despite the arrests of several Muslims abroad and inside America, despite heavy aerial bombardment and ground shelling in Iraq, Afghanistan and now in Pakistan through intermittent drone attacks, US-led forces have badly failed in obtaining their objectives. These tactics have killed more innocent civilians—created massive resentment against Washington, and have only been expanding the radicalism among the young men, turning them into suicide bombers, not only giving a greater setback to the security of Afghanistan and Pakistan, but also endangering the US itself.

In the aftermath of 9/11, suicide attacks in various Islamic countries including Spain and Britain, and an unending wave of the same in Iraq and Afghanistan have already shown that the Muslim revolutionaries are creating economic instability in the world, which is not conducive to American interests. Meanwhile, US-sponsored different war has proved that big powers have failed in crushing the power of the Islamic militants through armed forces and sophisticated weaponry. Such a state terrorism, especially by the solesuperpower has resulted into more terrorism from Nigeria to Afghanistan and from Somalia to Iraq, while jeopardizing American regional and global interests, besides destabilising the US economy which is dominated by the Jews.

It is of particular attention that despite a prolonged war against terrorism, defeatism in Iraq and Afghanistan, heavy cost of war, acute financial crisis inside America and debt crisis, like the previous American presidents, even President Barrack Obama has become helpless before the influence of Zionist Jews. In this context, in line with the Jewish-Indo lobbies, now, US intends to convert particularly Pakistan into a “failed state” by causing political and economic instability as a perennial wave of subversive acts, sponsored by CIA, RAW and Mossad coupled with the US threat of high-value targets inside the country indicate. Besides, Washington is going to act upon exit strategy from Afghanistan, so it has started shifting Afghan war to Pakistan.

On the other side, Obama has totally failed in convincing Tel Aviv to abandon “settlements,” and to end the continued humiliations of the Palestinians—starving people through Gaza blockade. However, Obama has also failed in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

In the words of Senator Fulbright,

“Israel’s control over Washington has grown tremendously like a malignant cancer…making the US as a puppet nation of Israel.”

As a matter of fact, if Obama does not act upon the Jewish demands, he will face the most powerful lobby in the US as The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) with the help of its powerful ties to Jewish wealth and power can easily defeat him by sending millions to his opponents and projecting them in the media.

Earlier Obama had also said that if elected, he would resolve the Kashmir problem to reduce nuclear dangers between Pakistan and India. But considering Indo-Israeli collective interests and anti-China strategy, he has become silence over this thorny issue.

Besides, during the useless war against terrorism, American military personnel have been sent to Iraq, Afghanistan, Philippines etc. for losing their lives for the Jewish agenda, while the foreign troops already stationed on American bases are further exceeding the US expenditures. In other words, this failed military policy in the era of modern world trends like peaceful settlement of disputes, and economic development is enslaving Americans. In essence, US tax payers are funding the Zionist-Jewish secret strategy.

Jews who are about 2 percent of the US population and only about 4 percent of the electorate nationwide, mould the internal and external policies of America by setting aside the majority opinion of the non-Jewish American nationals. In other words, this odd phenomenon makes the American democracy a farce and rendered the nation’s claim of a free world, adhering to the liberal policies, asserting champion of human rights obsolete.

In this respect, with reference to war on terror, in an article on September 25, 2011, titled,

“It Is Official: the US Is A Police State,” Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Treasury Secretary of the Reagan regime, wrote, “The methods used for the suppression of foreigners by military force and violence abroad are eventually mirrored in the homeland…America becomes ever more the police state at home.”

Arrests and detentions of the innocent Americans by the FBI, use of torture, without court approval, show violent extremism inside the US whose destiny is in the hands of Jews.

Like other Christians, I am agianst antisemitism, and strongly condemn the genocide of the Jews by the Hitler in the concentration camps, popuparly called the Holocaust. But question arises as to why Muslims and the non-Jewish American nationals, especially Christians must pay for the Zionist-shaped policies? And is there another holocaust in the making for these non-Jewish people?

No doubt, at present, US pays for the Zionist-oriented policies, but in future, it will further pay as multiple crises in the country indicate. Either America’s status will be reduced to the level of a developing country or could result into its downfall.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com