October 18, 2009

Iran-Venezuela-Cuba Alliance

Chavez, Gaddafi Push Africa-South America Unity

Reuters
September 27, 2009

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Libya's Muammar Gaddafi urged African and South American leaders on Saturday to strive for a new world order countering Western economic dominance.

They spoke on the first day of a 28-nation summit that was long on idealistic speeches but short on concrete steps beyond an agreement to set up a development bank for South America with $7 billion in start-up capital.
"This is the beginning of the salvation of our people," Chavez said in a speech welcoming his guests to the Caribbean island of Margarita.
He said the meeting, coming just after the U.N. General Assembly in New York and the G-20 summit in Pittsburgh, would help the mainly poor nations rely less on Europe and the United States.
"The 21st century won't be a bipolar world, it won't be unipolar. It will be multipolar. Africa will be an important geographic, economic and social pole. And South America will be too," Chavez said.
The leftist leader has governed for more than 10 years and says he wants to remain in office for decades more to turn the OPEC nation into a socialist state. He casts himself as at the front of a global, "anti-imperialist" movement.

'BUILD OUR OWN POWER'

Gaddafi, who is celebrating four decades in office and had a white limousine flown to Venezuela to meet him at the airport, echoed his host's message.
"The world isn't the five countries on the U.N. Security Council," he said. "The world's powers want to continue to hold on to their power. When they had the chance to help us, they treated us like animals, destroyed our land. Now we have to fight to build our own power."
Other leaders, from influential developing nations like Brazil and South Africa, also gave sweeping, critical summaries of global problems, though in less radical terms.

Analysts say Brazil and South Africa's model of business-friendly economics mixed with a focus on helping the poor is more popular among many African countries than Chavez's revolutionary approach.

The leaders are expected to sign a document on Sunday urging global bodies like the United Nations and World Bank to give poor countries more clout.

Chavez, hoping for the creation of an alternative to multilateral lenders like the International Monetary Fund, said South American countries had agreed to start the regional development bank, Banco del Sur with $7 billion. Earlier he said it would be funded with $20 billion, but Venezuelan officials clarified it could rise to that amount over time.
"Lula, now we need to find the money!" he joked to Brazilian leader Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
NUCLEAR STIR

On the eve of the summit, Venezuela caused a stir by saying it was working with ally Iran to find uranium in the South American nation.

But Venezuelan Energy Minister Rafael Ramirez sought to play down the issue on Saturday, telling Reuters the country had not developed a plan to explore or exploit its uranium deposits.

Ramirez did not respond when asked what role Iran was playing and said Venezuela was only working with Russia to develop nuclear energy which he said would be used for peaceful means.

Analysts say Venezuela is more than a decade away from developing nuclear power.

Chavez says he opposes nuclear weapons but insists the developed world does not have the right to stop other countries from developing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.

Venezuela's opposition called Chavez irresponsible for reaching out to what it said were unsavory regimes around the globe.
"Venezuela's dangerous friendship with autocratic and totalitarian governments like Belarus, Sudan, Libya, Zimbabwe, show Chavez's irresponsibility in seeking ties and alliances at any cost, without regard to the pariah state of these regimes," opposition group Mesa Unitaria said in a statement.

October 17, 2009

UN Goldstone Report Accuses Israel of War Crimes in Gaza

Israel Vows to Fight UN Report Amid France, UK Support

The 575-page report accuses the Israeli army of the deliberate killing of Palestinian civilians among other accusations of war crimes. US State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said the UN resolution had "an unbalanced focus and we're concerned that it will exacerbate polarization and divisiveness."

Press TV
October 17, 2009

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has pledged a "lengthy fight" against a United Nations report as the UK and France express support for Israel to “defend” itself.
"We are now setting out to delegitimize those who try to delegitimize us. We will not tolerate it and we will respond on a case by case basis," Netanyahu told a special ministerial forum Friday night.
The forum was held following the decision by the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to send the Goldstone report on Israeli war crimes in the Gaza Strip to the Security Council.

The rights assembly also adopted a resolution condemning Israel for the 22-day war in late 2008 against the Palestinians, which left at least 1,300 people dead.

The resolution has put Israel on the spotlight as leaders in Tel Aviv are facing growing international pressure.

In a letter to the Israeli premier, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy supported Israel's right to defend itself against 'terror'.

The two leaders also urged "independent, transparent investigation of Gaza events," Ynet reported.

France and Britain abstained from voting on the Goldstone report.

The 575-page report, written by South African war crimes prosecutor Richard Goldstone and three other international experts, accuses the Israeli army of the deliberate killing of Palestinian civilians among other accusations of war crimes.

US State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said that the endorsement per se did not necessarily mean that the Security Council will indeed review the report.

Kelly said the resolution had "an unbalanced focus and we're concerned that it will exacerbate polarization and divisiveness."

Gaza War Dominates U.N. Session

At issue is report that charges Israel, Hamas with war crimes

Washington Times
October 15, 2009

Diplomats mainly from the Islamic world used the monthly session of the U.N. Security Council on Wednesday to criticize Israel by citing a U.N. report charging Israel and Hamas with war crimes.
"The pursuit of accountability would, in the long term, better serve the cause of peace," said Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riad al-Maliki.
Israel responded that the report in question, by South African Judge Richard Goldstone, denied it the right of self-defense.

At issue is Judge Goldstone's report on the Dec. 27-Jan. 18 Israeli offensive on Gaza, in response to Palestinian rocket fire on Israeli cities.

The report said both sides committed possible war crimes against civilians.

The Goldstone report was commissioned by the Geneva-based U.N. Human Rights Council, which will begin its own debate on the report Thursday.

At least a half-dozen speakers on Wednesday demanded that Israel be referred to the International Criminal Court, which hears cases of global significance when the relevant countries are unable to undertake their own prosecutions.

Israel has not signed onto the court statute, meaning that the only way the United Nations can refer the Goldstone report to the court is through the Security Council.

U.S. Deputy Ambassador to the U.N. Alejandro Wolff criticized the report as unbalanced and said the debate should be held at the Human Rights Council in Geneva and not the Security Council.

Chief U.N. political adviser Lynn Pascoe urged Israel to conduct its own independent investigation into charges made in the report and elsewhere.
"Now, more than ever, it is vital that politics is made credible, and those who try to undermine politics by changing facts on the ground or resorting to violence are not allowed to set the agenda," Mr. Pascoe told the council.

"If we do not go forward decisively towards the two-state solution, we may go back to more violence, suffering and the loss of hope," he said.
Israel's U.N. ambassador, Gabriela Shalev, rejected the report, saying the Goldstone team "was given too wide a mandate, and failed to fully respect any government's right to protect its people."

Israel refused to receive the Goldstone team and did not cooperate with its investigation.

Gaza, Ms. Shalev said, was now occupied by the Islamic militant group Hamas, "an organization that has launched attacks from within schools, mosques and hospitals."

Estimates of the Gaza death toll run as high as 1,400, but a key issue is civilian casualties among Palestinians. Israel estimates the civilian death toll at 295, while the Palestinians put the number at 926.

Thirteen Israelis died during the war.

Israel Urged to Investigate Gaza War Crimes Charges

Reuters
October 14, 2009

Israel came under pressure from its Western allies on Wednesday to launch credible investigations into U.N. allegations of possible war crimes by its army during the war in the Gaza Strip.

The United States, Britain and France all said the Jewish state should look into findings published last month by a U.N. mission led by South African jurist Richard Goldstone.

Goldstone accused Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas of war crimes during the December-January war in Gaza. Both Israel and Hamas rejected the charges in his report, which is more critical of Israel than Hamas.

At a U.N. Security Council debate on the Middle East that was not expected to take action, Israel's U.N. ambassador, Gabriela Shalev, dismissed the report as a waste of the council's time, saying the 575-page document "favors and legitimizes terrorism."

Deputy U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Alejandro Wolff said Washington had serious concerns about the report, including what he said was its "unbalanced focus on Israel." But he repeated the U.S. view that Israel should look into it.
"We take the allegations in the report seriously," he told the council. "Israel has the institutions and the ability to carry out serious investigations of these allegations and we encourage it to do so."
Wolff said Hamas was a "terrorist organization" that was neither willing nor able to investigate its own behavior. Hamas -- the de facto ruler of Gaza -- does not recognize Israel's right to exist.

Goldstone's report called for the Security Council to refer the matter to the International Criminal Court in The Hague if the Israelis or the Palestinians fail to take up the issue.

Discussion of the report during the council's monthly Middle East debate was a compromise the United States reluctantly accepted. Washington had opposed discussing it in New York, saying it was a matter for the Geneva-based U.N. Human Rights Council, or HRC, which commissioned the report.

The rights council will discuss the report again on Thursday. Washington joined the HRC earlier this year, vowing to change from within a U.N. body that Washington and Israel have criticized as anti-Israeli.

British Ambassador John Sawers called on Israel to launch proper investigations into the charges outlined in the report.
"We note that the Israeli Defense Force has already conducted and is continuing to conduct a number of investigations," Sawers said. "However, concerns remain."

"We urge the Israeli government to carry out full, credible and impartial investigations into the allegations," he added.
French Ambassador Gerard Araud urged both sides to initiate "independent inquiries in line with international standards."

U.N. Undersecretary-General Lynn Pascoe told the council that Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon also wanted "credible domestic investigations" based on the Goldstone report.

Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malki said the Palestinian Authority took allegations of wrongdoing by Hamas militants seriously.

But Malki said the Palestinians "reject any equating of the occupying power's aggression and crimes with actions committed in response by the Palestinian side." He added that his government supported "domestic investigations."

Malki's West Bank-based government has tense relations with Hamas, which seized power in June 2007 in the Gaza Strip from Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah party. Fatah has little influence over Hamas in Gaza.

Israel, which has said the Goldstone commission's mandate was biased and refused to cooperate with it, said there was no point discussing the report in the Security Council.
"By trying to bring this report before a so-called urgent debate in this council, this council's attention was diverted from the reality in our region," Shalev said.
Quoting Shakespeare's "Macbeth," Shalev said such a debate was "a tale full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."

Speaking to reporters after addressing the 15-nation council, Shalev went further.
"We cannot resume the peace process as long as this (report) is on the table," she said, echoing comments by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Israel, the U.S. and the Arab World

Israel May Attack Iran After December - Le Canard Enchaine

DEBKAfile Special Report
October 15, 2009

According to an unconfirmed report in the French Le Canard Enchaine of Wednesday, Oct. 14, Israel is preparing to bomb Iranian nuclear sites and pro-Iranian targets across the Middle East after December 2009. The prestigious satirical weekly reports that the IDF has notified special forces reservists abroad to get ready to return home in November for immediate drafting to the military operation against Iranian nuclear facilities. The weekly further reports Israel has ordered combat rations from a French firm for these reservists to stay on long-term missions far from home.

French military sources said that Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi met secretly in France with US armed forces Chief of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen and French Chief of Staff Gen. Jean-Louis Georgelin, to inform that Israel planned to attack Iran after December, when it became clear that the talks between the six powers and Tehran had failed to produce any benefit.

According to Le Canard Enchaine, Ashkenazi said Israel would not attack Iran by air but rather use ground forces in coordinated operations on several Middle East fronts.

DEBKAfile's military sources add that if the information leaked to the newspaper from French joint staffs sources is correct - and not a red herring to disguise the impending attack's real nature - the IDF may be expected to branch out from Iran's nuclear facilities to target its allies too, such as Syrian air force and missile batteries, Hizballah bases in Lebanon and Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

Le Canard Enchaine is not alone in predicting an Israeli attack on Iran after December. A former Israeli deputy defense minister, Efraim Sneh, commented to US and British media several times in the past week that if the US fails to rally fellow powers' support for toughened sanctions against Iran by Christmas, Israel will have to attack its nuclear installations. It may be assumed that Sneh was not just guessing on his own initiative.

Another sign of the growing military tensions surrounding the Iranian nuclear program was a phone conversation late Wednesday night between President Barack Obama and French President Nicola Sarkozy. The two discussed Iran. After Hillary Clinton failed to swing Russian leaders round to supporting sanctions, when she visited Moscow Tuesday, DEBKAfile's Washington sources report that Obama has decided to work with the French president for efforts to stop Iran's nuclear program.

UN Endorsement of Anti-Israel Report on Gaza War Buries Peace Process

DEBKAfile Special Analysis
October 16, 2009

The UN Human Right Council's endorsement Friday, Oct. 16, sent the anti-Israel Goldstone war crimes report to the UN Security Council. It was approved by a majority of 25 of the 47 HRC members with 6 voting against - the US, Holland, Italy, Ukraine, Hungary and Slovakia - with 11 abstentions; France and the UK were among the 5 nations who did not vote. Ultimately, this step could expose Israeli leaders to prosecution for war crimes.

The UN body administered one of the most damaging blows Israel diplomacy has suffered in recent years, condemning Israel for alleged war crimes in its 22-day Gaza operation last January - but also for work in East Jerusalem such as housing construction and archeological excavations.
The damage was compounded by Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu's personal involvement in spearheading the campaign to have the report buried. Its endorsement has instead buried the stalled peace process between Israel and Palestinian Authority.

In any case, Mahmoud Abbas refused to come to the negotiating table when challenged for the umpteenth time by President Barack Obama's special envoy George Mitchell in Ramallah last week, bringing the US president's entire Middle East peace venture tumbling down.

Netanyahu failed even to persuade French president Nicolas Sarkozy - described by President Shimon Peres as "a great friend of Israel," and the British prime minister George Brown, with whom he had a heated telephone conversation Thursday night - to vote against the HRC motion.
That neither was prepared to oppose Israel's condemnation for war crimes means that Jerusalem cannot count on French or British support for curbing Iran's drive for a nuclear weapon.

While Abbas and his close circle celebrated their victory, Israel spokesmen tried to soften the blow by maintaining that the Goldstone report is not home and dry yet. Its impact on the US-led NATO war on terrorists in Afghanistan and Iraq must be considered. However, no NATO nation has yet been hauled before a UN commission of inquiry or faulted by the world body for killing civilians. Israel's operation to protect its population against terrorists embedded in civilian locations was.

Israel cannot be expected to sit down and talk to Abbas in this situation, even if the Palestinian leader were willing, which he is not. In any case he has lost the right to speak for his people.

DEBKAfile's Middle East sources note that the Palestinians have reached a point of no return, to which Washington and Jerusalem are turning a blind eye: Hamas has finally rejected any unity deal with Abbas' Fatah and thus blocked the formation of an agreed delegation for peace talks. The West Bank and Gaza Strip have parted for good: they are distinct Palestinian entities and Abbas' authority is recognized by less than half of his people in those territories.

The hammer-blow from Geneva came at a bad time for Israel: Turkey has turned on the Jewish state tooth and claw. Israel finds itself up against the entire Arab world, even Egypt and Jordan, with whom it has signed peace treaties. It now finds itself abandoned by presumed friends Britain and France as well.

October 16, 2009

Israel, the U.S. and the Arab World

John Bolton Suggests Nuclear Attack on Iran

By Daniel Luban, The Faster Times
October 16, 2009

This Friday, the American Enterprise Institute will host an event addressing the question “Should Israel attack Iran?” The event includes, among others, Iran uberhawk Michael Rubin and infamous “torture lawyer” John Yoo, but the real star is likely to be John Bolton, the former U.N. ambassador whose right-of-Attila views left him an outcast even within the second Bush administration. (Bolton was eventually forced out when it became clear that he would be unable to win Senate confirmation for the U.N. post.)

If Bolton’s recent rhetoric is any indication, his AEI appearance may accomplish the formidable feat of making Michael Rubin sound like a dove. Discussing Iran during a Tuesday speech at the University of Chicago, Bolton appeared to call for nothing less than an Israeli nuclear first strike against the Islamic Republic. (The speech, sponsored by the University Young Republicans and Chicago Friends of Israel, was titled, apparently without a trace of irony, “Ensuring Peace.”)

“Negotiations have failed, and so too have sanctions,” Bolton said, echoing his previously-stated belief that sanctions will prove ineffectual in changing Tehran’s behavior. “So we’re at a very unhappy point — a very unhappy point — where unless Israel is prepared to use nuclear weapons against Iran’s program, Iran will have nuclear weapons in the very near future.”

Bolton made clear that the latter option is unacceptable. “There are some people in the administration who think that it’s not really a problem, we can contain and deter Iran, as we did the Soviet Union during the Cold War. I think this is a great, great mistake and a dangerously weak approach…Whatever else you want to say about them, at least the Soviets believed that they only went around once in this world, and they weren’t real eager to give that up — as compared to a theological regime in Tehran which yearns for life in the hereafter more than life on earth…I don’t think [deterrence] works that way with a country like Iran.”
While Bolton coyly refused to spell out his conclusion, the implications of his argument were clear. If neither negotiations, nor sanctions, nor deterrence are options, then by his logic the only remaining option is for “Israel…to use nuclear weapons against Iran’s program.”

Of course, it is nothing new for Bolton and his neoconservative allies to threaten an Israeli strike against Iran. But Bolton’s use of the “n-word” is, I believe, new for him, and marks a significant rhetorical escalation from the hawks. An Israeli strike, nuclear or otherwise, without U.S. permission remains unlikely. But as it often the case, I suspect that Bolton’s intention is less to give an accurate description of reality than it is to stake out positions extreme enough to shift the boundaries of debate as a whole to the right.

October 12, 2009

Iran

Iran Dismisses U.S. Warning Before Nuclear Talks

Reuters
October 11, 2009

Iran dismissed on Monday a U.S. warning that major powers would not wait forever for Tehran to prove it was not developing nuclear bombs, saying any threats or deadlines would have no impact on the Islamic Republic.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassan Qashqavi, speaking a week before talks on a proposal to send Iranian uranium abroad for further processing, also reiterated Iran's refusal to discuss its "nuclear rights" with the six world powers.
"We have announced several times that we have nothing to discuss regarding that," he told a Tehran news conference in comments translated by Iran's state Press TV.

"That means continuation of our activities within the framework of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the safeguards agreement of the IAEA and enrichment on that basis," he said, referring to the U.N. nuclear watchdog.
Such comments were likely to fan Western suspicions that Iran is seeking to win time by stringing out inconclusive talks while mastering nuclear technology and stockpiling enriched uranium of potential use for atomic energy or weaponry.

Western diplomats believe Iran is trying to show just enough flexibility to keep trade allies Russia and China opposed to painful U.N. sanctions which could target its energy sector.

The West suspects Iran is seeking nuclear weapons capability behind the facade of what Tehran says is a civilian enrichment programme aimed at generating electricity.

Britain said on Monday it had ordered financial firms to cease business with Iran's Bank Mellat and Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines to counter a "significant risk" posed by Iranian activity facilitating development of nuclear weapons.
"The international community will not wait indefinitely for evidence that Iran is prepared to live up to its international obligations," U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in London on Sunday, alluding to U.N. demands for a nuclear halt.
Asked about her remark, Qashqavi said:
"If there is a deadline or any kind of threat in their comments, they will not impact us in any way."
In talks that both sides called constructive, Iran agreed with the United States, Russia, China, France, Germany and Britain in Geneva on Oct. 1 to give U.N. inspectors access to a newly disclosed enrichment plant near the city of Qom.

IRAN SUGGESTS IT DOESN'T NEED FUEL DEAL

Western diplomats say Iran also agreed in principle to send about 80 percent of its stockpile of low-enriched uranium to Russia and France for processing and return to Tehran. This would replenish dwindling fuel stocks for a reactor in the capital that produces medical isotopes, mainly for cancer care.

Iranian, Russian, French, U.S. and International Atomic Energy Agency officials will meet in Vienna on Oct. 19 to flesh out conditions, such as amounts of uranium to be sent abroad.
"There are 150 hospitals dependent on this reactor ... We want to receive this fuel from outside. That's why we are going to have the meeting and we hope that we'll reach an agreement," Qashqavi said.
But, echoing remarks by a spokesman for Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, he also suggested Tehran could provide the highly processed fuel material itself if there was no deal on external supply.

A Western security source in Europe said Iran earlier this year approved a plan to enrich uranium to 19.7 percent - well above the level needed for generating electricity - to yield material for the Tehran reactor without foreign help.

The plan set out a timetable of one year for fulfilment, he said. The source's account could not be immediately verified.

Any hint that Iran may embark on refining uranium above the 3.5 to 5 percent typically needed for power plant fuel would heighten Western fears of nuclear proliferation in the country.

Iran needs uranium refined to a purity of 19.7 percent for its Tehran reactor. Uranium refined to 20 percent or above is classified as highly enriched - theoretically usable for the fissile core of a nuclear bomb, although a minimum 80-90 percent is normally required for a viable weapon.

For world powers, the fuel deal's attraction would be in diminishing Iran's stockpile of low-enriched uranium, already enough to fuel one bomb if Tehran chose to enrich it further.

For Iran it would preserve medical isotope production.

Tehran has repeatedly rejected demands to halt or restrain its enrichment programme, despite three rounds of U.N. sanctions since 2006. The moderate progress in the Geneva talks muted Western calls for tougher sanctions in the near future.

October 10, 2009

Israel, the U.S. and the Arab World

Afghan Taliban Say They Pose No Threat to the West

Reuters
October 7, 2009

The Afghan Taliban pose no threat to the West but will continue their fight against occupying foreign forces, they said on Wednesday, the eighth anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion that removed them from power.

U.S.-led forces with the help of Afghan groups overthrew the Taliban government during a five week battle which started on October 7, 2001, after the militants refused to hand over al Qaeda leaders wanted by Washington for the September 11 attacks on America.
"We had and have no plan of harming countries of the world, including those in Europe ... our goal is the independence of the country and the building of an Islamic state," the Taliban said in a statement on the group's website.

"Still, if you (NATO and U.S. troops) want to colonize the country of proud and pious Afghans under the baseless pretext of a war on terror, then you should know that our patience will only increase and that we are ready for a long war."

U.S. President Barack Obama has said defeating the militants in Afghanistan and Pakistan is a top foreign policy priority and is evaluating whether to send thousands of extra troops to the country as requested by the commander of NATO and U.S. forces.

In a review of the war in Afghanistan submitted to the Pentagon last month, U.S. General Stanley McChrystal, in charge of all foreign forces, said defeating the insurgents would likely result in failure unless more troops were sent.

There are currently more than 100,000 foreign troops in the country, roughly two-thirds of who are Americans.

The Taliban statement comes at a time when Western officials warn that deserting Afghanistan could mean a return to power for the Taliban and the country could once again become a safe haven for al Qaeda militants, who could use it as a base to plan future attacks on Western countries.

The Taliban have made a comeback in recent years, spreading their attacks to previously secure areas. The growing insecurity has further added to the frustration of ordinary Afghans with the West and President Hamid Karzai's government, in power since the Taliban's ouster.

Since 2001, each year, several thousand Afghans, many of them civilians, have been killed in Afghanistan, with Taliban and al Qaeda leaders still at large despite the rising number of foreign troops.

In the statement, the Taliban said the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan for its refusal to hand over al Qaeda leaders, was hasty and unjustified. Washington had not given leaders of the movement any proof to show the involvement of al Qaeda in the September 11 attacks, it said.

Washington was using the so-called war on terror in Afghanistan and in Iraq as part of its expansionist goals in the Middle East, central and southeast Asia, it said.

It recalled the defeat of British forces in the 19th century and the fate of the former Soviet Union in the 1980s in Afghanistan as a lesson to those nations who have troops in the country.

Qari Mohammad Yousuf, a spokesman for the Taliban, said the withdrawal of foreign troops was the only solution to a conflict that has grown in intensity and has pushed some European nations to refuse to send their soldiers into battle zones or to speak about a timetable to withdraw from the country.

Some 1,500 foreign troops have also died in Afghanistan since the Taliban's ouster causing many nations to question the presence of its soldiers in the country and whether stability can ever be achieved eight years after the overthrow of the militants.

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Fresh Clashes Mar Al-Aqsa Prayers

BBC
October 9, 2009


Palestinians throw stones at riot police in East Jerusalem 09.10.09
Protesters threw stones at police in riot gear

Clashes have broken out in East Jerusalem amid high tensions after Palestinian groups called for a day of protest over access to al-Aqsa mosque.

Eleven police officers were injured and at least two Palestinians arrested as youths threw stones.

But Friday prayers at the flashpoint holy site passed off largely peacefully amid a heavy Israeli police presence.

Meanwhile, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said talks with US envoy George Mitchell were "constructive".

Mr Mitchell was due to meet with Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas on Friday, and to hold further talks with Mr Netanyahu's aides on Saturday.

US attempts to restart peace negotiations appear to have stalled over Israel's refusal to meet US and Palestinian demands that it freeze all settlement activity in the West Bank.

Israel has made clear that it intends to keep building in East Jerusalem, where the Palestinians want the capital of their future state.

The Palestinian Authority has accused Israel of seeking to "Judaise" East Jerusalem, and of allowing extremists access to the al-Aqsa mosque compound while denying it to Muslims.

Thousands of extra Israeli police were deployed on Friday after sporadic clashes over the past two weeks, apparently sparked by Palestinian fears that Jewish extremists were seeking to enter the third holiest site in Islam.

The complex, known to Muslims as Haram al-Sharif and Jews as Temple Mount, houses both al-Aqsa mosque and the Jewish holy site, the Western Wall.

The Islamist group Hamas had called for a "day of rage" on Friday, local media said, while its rival Fatah had urged a strike and peaceful protests in support of the mosque.

The Islamic Movement - a political organisation based in Israel - had urged Muslim citizens of Israel to flock to Jerusalem to "defend al-Aqsa".

On Friday Israeli police maintained restrictions under which only female worshippers and men over the age of 50 were permitted to enter the mosque area.

The site and surrounding area in the Old City remained calm, with many shops closed.

But in the Ras al-Amoud area of East Jerusalem, masked Palestinian youths began hurling stones at police in riot gear.

Clashes were reported at Qalandia checkpoint near the West Bank city of Ramallah.

And the Islamic movement Hamas held a rally in the Gaza Strip, which it controls.

Tensions have been high since 30 people were injured in a riot at the al-Aqsa complex in late September.

Palestinians threw stones at visitors they believed were right-wing Jews, although Israeli police say they were French tourists.

The site has been a flashpoint for violence in the past, including the beginning of the intifada or uprising that started in 2000.

Temple Mount Entry Restricted Following Riots

Israel News
October 4, 2009

Jerusalem Police holds security assessment following capital riots, decides to limit visitation to religious site to worshipers only.

The Jerusalem Police decided to keep the Temple Mount compound closed to visitors Monday.

The decision followed a security assessment held at the district's headquarters in the wake of Sunday's riots.

Nevertheless, police will allow Muslim Worshipers aged 50 and over and women of all ages, who carry Israeli IDs, to attend services.

The police initially restricted access to the compound – both to tourists and visitors – as a precautionary measure, after learning that residents of east Jerusalem were urged to "come to protect the Mount." Large police forces were deployed in the Old City as well.

The would-be precautionary measure backfired, as shortly after word that the compound had been closed spread, some 150 Arabs arrived at the Lions Gate and began stoning security forces.

The demonstrators were pushed back towards the Wadi Joz neighborhood, where they continued to riot.

Two police officers were lightly injured and five rioters were arrested, including Fatah's Jerusalem portfolio holder Hatem Abdel Kader and Sheikh Kamal Khatib, of the Northern Islamic Movement.

All five were arraigned Sunday evening by the Jerusalem Magistrate's Court and were released on bail. The court issued a restraining order against both, barring Abdel Kader from the Old City for 15 days, and Khatib from Jerusalem-proper for 15 days as well.

Arab Reporter Wounded During Jerusalem Riots Slams Police Conduct

Israel News
October 4, 2009

Abdallah Zidan arrived at Temple Mount compound to pray, cover events for Islamic Movement's website. 'Officer hit me with baton for no reason,' he says. Police deny claims.

A reporter for the Arab-Israeli news website PLS48.net was injured during the riots that broke out Sunday morning at the Temple Mount compound in Jerusalem's Old City. He claims a police officer struck him with a baton and disappeared. Police reject the claims.

Reporter Abdallah Zidan arrived at the Temple Mount at dawn to cover the prayers for his website, which is sponsored by the Islamic Movement's northern branch.

Many heeded Islamic Movement leader Sheikh Raad Salah's call to arrive at the Al-Aqsa Mosque after word got out that extreme-right wing Jews would be making their way to the site as well.

Zidan, a resident of the Manda village in the Galilee was among the visitors, and along with a group of fellow worshipers arrived at the entrance gate at around 5 am. A tumult suddenly erupted near Sheikh Kamal Khatib, Salah's deputy, who was standing in Zidan's vicinity.

Khatib, who was later arrested on suspicion of incitement, was surrounded by people who prevented officers from reaching him. Zidan claims that during the fracas a police officer struck him with a baton in a forceful manner.
"I started bleeding from my eye, the people around me tried to help but the police officer disappeared," Zidan recalled.
'Officers behaving like animals'

Zidan was evacuated to an east Jerusalem hospital and transferred by ambulance to the Hadassah Ein Kerem Hospital.
"I was lucky the actual eye wasn't hurt, it was very close," said Zidan, who required stitches.

"Police officers were behaving very brutally, like animals. They came and hit me for no reason. Media personnel who come for news coverage cannot be hurt in such a way," he said.
The reporter added that he intends on filing a complaint against the officer with the Justice Ministry.

Jerusalem Police rejected the claims and stated:
"Border Guard forces together with minority section officers requested Kamal Khatib to come with them, which he did. Nothing unusual occurred at any stage of his arrest. It went by very smoothly."

35 Lightly Injured in Temple Mount Riots

Israel News
September 27, 2009

Group of tourists enters holy site in Jerusalem accompanied by police force. Some 150 Muslim worshippers gather around them, some hurling stones. Eighteen policemen, 17 worshippers lightly hurt; 11 people detained.

Eighteen policemen and 17 Muslim worshippers were lightly injured in riots which erupted Sunday morning at the Temple Mount holy site in Jerusalem.

The police officers were wounded by stones hurled by rioters and were evacuated to the Shaare Zedek and Hadassah Ein Kerem hospitals in the capital. Eleven people were arrested on suspicion of hurling stones.

Following the riots, the police prevented worshippers from entering the compound.

The incident began when a group of tourists entered the Temple Mount compound accompanied by a police force. At a certain stage, some 150 worshippers started gathering around them and calling out towards them.

Some of the worshippers began throwing stones at the group. The police force fired stun grenades in an attempt to gain control of the riot. Eighteen police officers were lightly injured by stones. Six of them received medical treatment on the site and the rest were evacuated to hospitals.

Fifteen worshippers were injured by stones and two were lightly hurt by the stun grenades and were evacuated to the al-Maqasid Hospital in east Jerusalem. Adult worshippers attempted to calm things down, while the group of tourists was removed from the site.

Several stone throwing incidents were recorded in the alleys of the Old City after the riot. There were no reports of injuries or damage. Many police officers were deployed in the area, and Police Commissioner Dudi Cohen arrived at the Temple Mount and held an evaluation of the situations with senior commanders.

Police on high alert

The defense establishment has declared a heightened state of alert across the country ahead of the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur. On Saturday evening, a closure was imposed on the West Bank until Monday at midnight. Residents will only be allowed to cross into Israel in humanitarian cases.

The defense establishment will focus its Yom Kippur Eve activity around cemeteries, while on Yom Kippur itself forces will be deployed around synagogues.

Vehicles will not be allowed to pass from east Jerusalem to the western part of the city in order to minimize the friction between Jews and Arabs.

Israel, the U.S. and the Arab World

Tehran Moves to Impose Gasoline Rationing to be Ready for Showdown with U.S.

DEBKAfile
October 9, 2009

The Islamic regime in Tehran plans to slash the supply of subsided gasoline to the public by 45 percent and ration individual purchases to 55 liters per month, down from the 100 allowed at present.

This announcement Wednesday, Oct. 8, by Iranian oil minister Massoud Mirkazemi was Tehran's second step ahead of an expected showdown with the West over its nuclear program. Accusing the US of involvement in the disappearance of an important Iranian nuclear scientist was the first.

The government will have no difficulty in getting the measure through the tame Majlis (Iranian parliament).

Iran imports 40 percent of its gasoline needs because it is short of oil refineries. This shortage is sustained to boost the revenues of the Revolutionary Guards, which own a monopoly on gasoline imports. It has now become a strategic threat to the regime, curtailing fuel supplies for the military in the event of war and undermining Iran's ability to withstand severe sanctions.

Rationing may also provoke domestic unrest. Only 4.2 million liters of gasoline a day will be released, instead of the current 8 million. This will free up some 60,000 or so barrels a day for the Revolutionary Guards emergency stores. A much smaller cutback in 2007 caused serious riots in major cities; many gas stations and fuel depots were set on fire.

Earlier this week, Iran's foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki confronted Washington with a charge of US involvement in the disappearance of a nuclear scientist while on a pilgrimage to Mecca last May.

'Iran Will Blow Up the Heart of Israel'

Iran will "blow up the heart of Israel" if the United States or the Jewish state attacked it first, a top official with Iran's most powerful military force, the Revolutionary Guard, warned Friday.

The Jerusalem Post
October 10, 2009

Israel & Region World Cleric Mojtaba Zolnour, who is Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's representative in the Guard, said that if a US or Israeli missile lands in Iran, Iranian missiles will hit Israel in retaliation.
"Should a single American or Zionist missile land in our country, before the dust settles, Iranian missiles will blow up the heart of Israel," Zolnour was quoted as saying by the state IRNA news agency.
In March, Iran's deputy army chief made similar remarks, warning that his country will eliminate Israel if it attacks the Islamic republic.
"Should Israel take any action against Iran, we will eliminate Israel from the scene of the universe," Gen. Muhammad Reza Ashtiani said at the time in Teheran.
Ashtiani claimed Israel was "very vulnerable" and dismissed allegations that Iran was worried about Israeli maneuvers.
"Due to its special conditions, Israel is very vulnerable in the region," he said. "The aggressors will face a crushing response."

October 9, 2009

Pakistan

Pakistan Vows Offensive After Bomb Kills 49

Associated Press
October 9, 2009

PESHAWAR, Pakistan – Pakistan vowed to launch a new offensive against militant strongholds along the Afghan border after a suicide bomber blew up a car near a crowded outdoor market on Friday, killing 49 people in the bloodiest attack to hit the country in six months.

The United States has been pushing Pakistan to take strong action against insurgents who are using its soil as a base for attacks in neighboring Afghanistan. A push into the rugged mountains of South Waziristan could be risky for the army, which was beaten back on three previous offensives into the Taliban heartland there and forced to sign peace deals.

But the army may have been emboldened by a reasonably successful military campaign in the Swat Valley and adjoining Buner district and by the killing in a U.S. missile strike of Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud. The military also appears committed to destroying Mehsud's group, as opposed to its often ambivalent position toward other insurgents in the past.

Islamic militants have been carrying out nearly weekly attacks in Pakistan, but the sheer scale of Friday's bombing — which killed nine children — pushed the government to declare it would take the fight to South Waziristan, part of the lawless tribal belt where al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden may be hiding.

Interior Minister Rehman Malik said the militants had left the government "no other option" but to hit back. "We will have to proceed," he told a local television station. "All roads are leading to South Waziristan."

The massive blast tore through a busy road in the heart of Peshawar, a city of more than 3 million people about 150 miles northeast of South Waziristan along the Afghan border. The force of the bomb flipped a bus on its side, ripped apart a motorbike and flung charred debris down the street.

Passers-by pulled out the wounded and the dead, covering the bodies of victims whose clothes were burned. One man staggered down the road, his face covered with blood.

Another man dashed from the scene carrying an 8-year-old girl dressed in a bright orange outfit in his arms. The child, Amna Bibi, was heading to a wedding when she was caught by the blast. Her family, sobbing at the main Peshawar hospital in their wedding finery, said later that she had died. Amna's mother, Zareen, kissed her daughter's bandaged face and wept.
"I understood for the first time in my life what doomsday would look like," said Noor Alam, who suffered wounds to his legs and face.
The hospital was overwhelmed by the wounded, with many forced to share beds. Some of the dead were laid out on nearby gurneys, covered with sheets.
"I pray to Allah, please destroy all these people who are killing the innocents," said Sher Akbar from his hospital bed.
Zafar Iqbal, a doctor at the hospital, said 49 people were killed and more than 100 were wounded.

Peshawar Police Chief Liaqat Ali Khan said the attacker drove a car packed with a massive amount of explosives and artillery rounds. The blast was heard for miles around.

There was no claim of responsibility for the bombing and its target was not immediately apparent. Militants typically attack government, military or Western targets, but previous blasts have hit public places as well.

The bombing, along with an attack Monday at a U.N. aid agency in Islamabad that killed five, highlighted the insurgents' ability to hit major cities despite previous army offensives and Mehsud's death in August.

In April, the military launched a three-month offensive in the Swat Valley and largely cleared the region of the thousands of Taliban reportedly based there. That operation followed an August 2008 offensive in the semiautonomous Bajur tribal area along the Afghan border that ended six months later with the army declaring success. The militants have fought back with scores of suicide attacks.

For months, officials have been hinting at a new operation in South Waziristan, blockading roads there and carrying out targeted airstrikes as thousands of civilians fled the area.

But until Malik's comments Friday, no Pakistani official had publicly declared the military was preparing a full offensive.

Malik did not give a timeline for an offensive that is likely to be far fiercer than the Swat and Bajur battles.

The army has launched three operations in South Waziristan since 2001 but each time has been forced to abandon the push and sign peace deals with the militants.

The region is considered the epicenter of militant resistance in the country, and new Taliban chief Hakimullah Mehsud, who pledged to repel any attack, is reported to have 10,000 guerrilla fighters on his side. An Associated Press reporter visiting the area this week saw Taliban taking up key vantage points, and residents said fighters were digging trenches along routes the military was expected to traverse.

The area is filled with independent, heavily armed Pashtun tribes hostile to outsiders — including the Pakistani army — and any offensive that led to high civilian casualties could spark a quick public backlash and bolster the Taliban.

October 7, 2009

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Abbas' Palestinians Try to Cash In on Jerusalem Unrest for Talks with Mitchell

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report
October 7, 2009

Israeli security forces are on high alert for a fresh round of Muslim unrest centering on Temple Mount on Friday, Oct. 9.

The arrest Tuesday night, Oct. 6, of the Israeli Islamic leader Raed Salah on charges of inciting the four-day Muslim rampage on Temple Mount - and sedition - was a point up for his partners, the Palestinian Hamas. The pose Salah struck of a Muslim hero defending al Aqsa mosque (against a fabricated assault) rallied Islamist support. Although an Israeli magistrate released Salah on bail - in defiance of the Israel police's application to hold him as a public menace - and although he was barred from entering Jerusalem for 30 days, the Israeli Muslim leader lost no time in adding "martyr" to his performance as hero.

Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah-led Palestinian Authority in Ramallah took a couple of days to catch up with the Hamas-backed campaign. Tuesday, his spokesmen loosed a torrent of abuse, accusing Israel of igniting the Palestinian unrest which swept out from Temple Mount to Jerusalem's suburbs and hauling out their old war cry: "The Jews are plotting to tear down al Aqsa and rebuild their temple!"

Abbas has taken a ton of flak for the Palestinian Authority's consent to the postponement of a UN Security Council debate on the Goldstone war crimes report on the Gaza conflict earlier this year.

Caught wrong-footed on two counts in the Palestinian street, Abbas hopes to put things right by cashing in on the Jerusalem unrest for political gain:

1. The mosques are administered by the Muslim Waqf (religious foundation) while the Temple Mount site is under Israel's security control. The Palestinian leader will use Jerusalem as the most burning issue in the way of peace negotiations and present Israel as incapable of maintaining security and order for Muslims to pray in their mosques on Temple Mount. He will claim Israel prevents Muslim worship at al Aqsa when in fact the authorities have closed the site to Jewish worship. When the US envoy George Mitchell arrives Wednesday night, Oct. 6, he will be confronted with these grievances.

2. It will serve as the pretext for the Palestinians to lobby for Temple Mount to be declared an exclusive Muslim shrine off-limits to members of other faiths. Gaining this point would be one up for Abbas' Fatah over Hamas.

Since giving up the ancient site of the two Jewish temples is unthinkable for Israel - and Muslim leaders will never heed the Israeli rabbi's call for the heads of the three monotheistic religions to work together for a solution - Palestinian and Israeli Muslims will keep the unrest simmering.

Israel, the U.S. and the Arab World

Massive Ordnance Penetrator: Another Sign Obama Will Strike Iran

Kurt Nimmo, Infowars
October 7, 2009

The Pentagon has put a new weapon on the fast-track. The Massive Ordnance Penetrator is a 30,000-pound bomb designed to hit targets buried 200 feet below ground. Earlier this year, the Pentagon comptroller sent a request to shift funds to the House and Senate Appropriations and Armed Services Committees in order to fast forward the development and procurement of the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, according to ABC News. The notification was included in a 93-page “reprogramming” request that included hundreds of items.

See the Pentagon memo here.

The comptroller said the Pentagon planned to spend $19.1 million to procure four of the bombs, $28.3 million to accelerate the bomb’s “development and testing”, and $21 million to accelerate the integration of the bomb onto B-2 stealth bombers.

The Air Force 708th Armament Systems Group at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida awarded a $51.9 million contract on October 2 to the Boeing Co. in St. Louis to integrate the Massive Ordnance Penetrator on a B-2 stealth bomber, the Military & Aero website reported on October 4.

“The Department has an Urgent Operational Need (UON) for the capability to strike hard and deeply buried targets in high threat environments. The MOP is the weapon of choice to meet the requirements of the UON.” It further states that the request is endorsed by Pacific Command (which has responsibility over North Korea) and Central Command (which has responsibility over Iran),” the notification states.

“This is not the kind of weapon that would be particularly useful in Iraq or Afghanistan, but it is ideally suited to hit deeply buried nuclear facilities such as Natanz or Qom in Iran,” ABC notes.

“A deep underground tunnel facility in a rock geology poses a significant challenge for non-nuclear weapons. Such a target is difficult to penetrate, except possibly near an adit, and the likelihood of damaging critical functional components deep within the facility from an energy release at the adit is low. Past test experience has shown that 2,000 lb. penetrators carrying 500 lbs. of high explosive are relatively ineffective against tunnels, even when skipped directly into the tunnel entrance,” explains GlobalSecurity.

MOP contains more than 5,300 pounds of conventional explosives inside of a 20.5-foot-long steel enclosure. The weapon is said to be able to penetrate up to about 60 feet of dirt and concrete, the Defense Daily reported on December 4, 2006.

The Pentagon has moved the MOP to the fast track because the Iran attack plan is now operational and will probably be carried out before the end of the year.

The corporate media is now gearing up for an attack by manufacturing census in much the same way they did in the lead-up to the devastating mass murder campaign on Iraq that ultimately resulted in more than a million dead Iraqis. “A majority of Americans are skeptical that diplomacy with Iran will succeed and say the U.S. should use military action if necessary to prevent the Iranian government from developing a nuclear weapon,” Bloomberg reported on October 6. “A Pew Research Center for the People & the Press survey released today found 61 percent of Americans would support a military strike. Twenty-four percent said it is more important to avoid conflict even if that means Iran will end up building nuclear arms.”

Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction, as the government and the corporate media claimed, and Iran is not developing nuclear weapons. In September, the U.S. intelligence community told the White House that Iran has not restarted its nuclear-weapons development program. Also in September, the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog, Mohamed ElBaradei, denied Israeli accusations that he has withheld information about Iran’s nuclear progress. Since 2003, the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly stated that it has found no evidence that Iran is developing nuclear weapons.

Moreover, as Juan Cole notes, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei issued a fatwa in 2005 that states no Islamic state may possess or use atomic weapons because they kill masses of innocent civilians when used, which is contrary to the Islamic law of war, which forbids killing innocent non-combatants.

The only state in the Middle East that has nuclear weapons is Israel.

“Those who insist that Iran is trying to get a bomb have a difficult time explaining why Khamenei forbids it as un-Islamic and why the president and others all deny it. It is possible that they are lying, but their denials at least have to be noted and analyzed. The skeptics also have to explain away why the 16 US intelligence agencies say after exhaustive espionage and investigation that there is no weapons program now and that there hasn’t been one for some time,” Cole writes.

None of these arguments matter to the global elite because they are determined to reduce Iran to a pile of smoldering rubble much the same way Iraq was reduced. After the Pentagon gets a green light and loads up its stealth bombers with MOPs and other munitions, the destruction will not be limited to Natanz and Qom and Iran’s illusory nuclear weapons program. Iran’s infrastructure will be targeted. Iran’s non-existent nuclear weapons program is merely an excuse for a larger objective — the wholesale destruction of Iranian society and civilization.

October 6, 2009

Afghanistan

Taliban Under NATO-Afghan Counter-Attack After Killing 8 US Troops

DEBKAfile Special Report
October 5, 2009

The governor of the remote eastern Afghanistan province of Nuristan, Jamaluddin Badr, reported Monday, Oct. 5, that NATO and Afghan soldiers had besieged a Taliban force in the Kamdesh district the day after eight US soldiers and two Afghans were killed in two deadly attacks in the province.

He said police officers, including the top district commander were missing. The Taliban say they are holding 13 police including the police chief.

The Taliban attacked the US-Afghan force Sunday with rocket propelled grenades, machine guns and rifles from a mosque and a nearby village. US Col. Randy George reported the joint force had repelled the attack in a gun battle that inflicted heavy enemy casualties. He added:
"Coalition forces' previously announced plans to depart the area as part of a broader realignment to protect larger populations remains unchanged."
US forces have suffered some of their worst casualties in the east, where they have tried to control remote mountain passes used by Taliban fighters as infiltration routes from Pakistan.

The number of NATO casualties in the eight-year conflict peaked in the year 2009 to 386 including 228 Americans. Gen. McChrystal's request for more troops to determine its outcome awaits a White House decision on strategy

War in Afghanistan: Next Steps Will Hit Home in North Carolina

By Barbara Barrett, newsobserver.com
October 4, 2009

As President Barack Obama huddles with top advisers about the future of Afghanistan, he must figure out how best to approach a troubling and complicated conflict.

Should he blanket the nation with up to 40,000 more troops, as recommended by the top commander in Afghanistan? Or should he focus on a more narrow counterinsurgency campaign, aided by Special Forces and drone Predators, as advised by Vice President Joe Biden?

Whatever approach Obama takes will have repercussions in North Carolina, home to two of the military's top bases, the Marines' Camp Lejeune and the Army's Fort Bragg. Nearly 17,000 troops from the twobases now serve in Afghanistan -- about one-fourth of the nation's military presence there.

Beyond the full-time military, hundreds of N.C. National Guard soldiers have cycled through the country, flying Apache helicopters in combat, running detention centers and sending C-130 supply missions into the nation's far-flung rural regions.

Members of North Carolina's congressional delegation are considering the president's decision. Nearly half its members sit on committees related to the war effort. North Carolina's lawmakers are talking with generals, reviewing intelligence reports and hosting visitors from Afghanistan's parliament.

Many say that before choosing a military solution, they first must figure out the United States' long-term goals in Afghanistan.
"The core question is: What is the threat to the United States?" said Democratic Rep. Larry Kissell of Biscoe.

No matter what, said Republican Rep. Sue Myrick of Charlotte, "We can't walk away from it. We cannot just leave, because if we did, [the Taliban] would totally take over."
North Carolina's lawmakers said in interviews that they want to achieve as much as possible -- a stable Afghanistan, a defeated terrorist network -- but acknowledged that the path to success is lined with pitfalls.

Sen. Kay Hagan, a Greensboro Democrat, and other senators met last week with Obama's national security adviser, Gen. Jay Jones, to talk about Afghanistan. Hagan is scheduled to meet this week with Obama's diplomat for the region, Richard Holbrooke.
"We've got to be sure the Taliban is not using Afghanistan for terrorism, and we've got to defeat the al-Qaida extremists along the Afghanistan and Pakistan border," Hagan said.
Hagan, who serves on the Armed Services committee, in May visited Afghanistan's Helmand province, the region of some of this summer's most intense fighting.

Although she has read the internal report of Army Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, who has recommended up to 40,000 more troops in Afghanistan, Hagan isn't ready to endorse it.
"We're not here for nation-building. I'm not into that," Hagan said. But, she added, she wants to help Afghans develop the country's economic stability and national security.
Hands off, or on?

Most of the state's lawmakers hesitated to make a recommendation for Obama.
"I don't want to be prejudging or presuming anything," said Kissell, a member of the House Armed Services committee whose district includes part of Fort Bragg.
But an expert on Afghanistan at UNC-Chapel Hill said lawmakers ought to have a role in shaping policy on the issue.
"All these discussions revolve around having a clear-headed picture of what the strategic goal is from a U.S. perspective: What do you want to happen in Afghanistan?" said Andrew Reynolds, a political scientist who visited Afghanistan frequently between 2003 and 2007.

"There are different strategic goals," he said. One goal would be to create an Afghanistan that will not harbor international terrorists who could attack the United States.

Another, far-reaching goal would develop a stable democracy in the country, he said.
But Reynolds, who returned from Pakistan a week ago, said he isn't sure any long-term plan exists.
"It's not clear the White House or Congress has an idea of where we're going from here," he said.
Myrick, who serves on the House Intelligence committee, said she worries about terrorists expanding their networks beyond Afghanistan -- not only into Pakistan, but also North African countries such as Somalia and Yemen.
"I have real concerns that we're not paying enough attention to that," she said.
Myrick says Obama should step up the nation's human intelligence-gathering network even as he pushes ahead in Afghanistan. She said the primary focus should be on protecting the United States.
"It's not our job to decide what the government ofAfghanistan should be," Myrick said.
Last month, Democratic Rep. David Price of Chapel Hill led a seminar for members of Afghanistan's parliament who were visiting Congress as part of an exchange program that Price helps run for emerging democracies.

Price, who traveled to Afghanistan in 2006, sees the nation's parliament as a bright spot in an otherwise struggling government -- one that gives him hope for the country's future as a democracy.

Afghanistan needs to become a state that can control its own borders and serve its citizens, he said.
"I'm not expecting a Jeffersonian democracy," Price said. "We're talking about a government that's legitimate in the eyes of its people."
State's high stakes

Whatever Obama decides, it's certain that North Carolina's military community will continue to play a role.

The Army's elite Special Forces troops, which are used for high-risk counterinsurgency work, train at Fort Bragg. Members of the 82nd Airborne learned last month their tour in Afghanistan would be extended 50 days.

And this week, the Department of Defense announced its 773rd casualty in Afghanistan. Lance Cpl. Jordan L. Chrobot, 24, killed in Helmand province, was stationed at Camp Lejeune.

By now, an estimated 68,000 troops are serving in Afghanistan, but they continue to face challenges in equipment, reinforcements and rest, said Rep. Mike McIntyre, a Democrat whose district includes a part of Fort Bragg.
"You've got to be sure they're taken care of," McIntyre said.
McIntyre, who serves on the House Armed Services Committee, said he wants to root out terrorism, improve intelligence, and ensure that Afghanistan's military and police forces are properly trained.

But he already knows that he supports McChrystal's request for additional troops to bolster those now serving in the war zone.
"Clearly we are at a crossroads," McIntyre said. "Now is not the time to downsize."

Pakistan

Has the Back of the Pakistani Taliban Been Broken?

Reuters
October 5, 2009

A suicide bomber dressed as a paramilitary soldier attacked an office of the U.N. World Food Programme (WFP) in the Pakistani capital on Monday killing five staff members, government and U.N. officials said.

Violence has been picking up in Pakistan after a relative lull that followed the killing of the Pakistani Taliban leader in a U.S. drone attack last month, and after troops made gains in an assault launched in the Swat region in April.

There was no claim of responsibility for Monday's attack but Interior Minister Rehman Malik repeated his assertion that the back of the Pakistani Taliban had been broken, saying they were striking out like a wounded snake.

Here are some questions and answers about the Pakistani Taliban.

WHY IS THE GOVERNMENT TRUMPETING SUCCESS?

The army largely cleared the former Taliban bastion in the Swat valley, 120 km (80 miles) northwest of Islamabad, with an offensive launched in April.

Another militant enclave, the Bajaur ethnic Pashtun tribal region on the Afghan border, was largely cleared earlier although intermittent clashes and bomb attacks occur in both places.

The biggest blow to the Taliban was the killing of their overall leader, Baitullah Mehsud, in an attack by a missile-firing U.S. drone aircraft in his South Waziristan stronghold on the Afghan border on Aug 5. Several top Taliban members, including one of Mehsud's aides and former spokesman and the spokesman from Swat, have been captured.

HAS THE MILITANTS' BACK REALLY BEEN BROKEN?

While largely forced out of Swat and Bajaur and, according to Pakistani and U.S. officials, in disarray after Mehsud's death, there are still thousands of well-armed fighters in South Waziristan and other regions.

The new overall Taliban leader, Hakimullah Mehsud, put to rest U.S. and Pakistani speculation he may have been killed in a power struggle last month by meeting reporters in South Waziristan on Sunday.

He vowed revenge for Baitullah's killing. Monday's bomb and similar attacks over the past couple of weeks have set back hopes the militants were on the back foot.

Some analysts say the militants have been given time to regroup because the army has put off an offensive against their South Waziristan bastion.

WHAT WILL PAKISTAN DO NEXT?

The army is preparing an offensive on the militants' South Waziristan stronghold but it has declined to say when it would begin.

Over recent months, security forces have been launching air and artillery strikes, while moving in troops, blockading the region and trying to split off factions.

The army says it has two divisions, or up to 28,000 soldiers, in place preparing to take on an estimated 10,000 hardcore Taliban in South Waziristan. Analysts say fighting would be intense against the tough militants, including up to 1,000 Uzbeks, and the army could expect heavy casualties.

WHAT IMPLICATIONS FOR AFGHANISTAN?

Many analysts say Pakistan is acting only against the militants which threaten it, like the Pakistani Taliban, while leaving alone those focused on fighting in Afghanistan.

Whatever the truth of that, Pakistan can argue that it can only focus on one area at a time -- South Waziristan. If and when the Pakistani Taliban are defeated in South Waziristan, the United States will push Pakistan to shift attention to the Afghan Taliban factions operating out of western Pakistani enclaves.

Pakistan rejects U.S. complaints that the Afghan Taliban led by Mullah Mohammad Omar are operating from the town of Quetta in Pakistan's Baluchistan province, in the so-called "Quetta shura," or leadership council.

Despite such denials, analysts say some Pakistanis see Afghan Taliban groups as a useful tool to counter the growing influence of old rival India in Afghanistan.

With U.S. and Afghan officials increasingly raising the possibility of talks with the Afghan Taliban to end that war, analysts say Pakistan is unlikely to move with full force against the groups that might be part of a negotiated settlement and would provide it with leverage in Afghanistan.

Flanked by heavily armed fighters, the new leader of the Pakistani Taliban sat on a blue blanket, amiable and relaxed as he cracked jokes and mixed in threats of vengeance for deadly U.S. airstrikes.

Pakistan Taliban Head Cracks Jokes, Vows Vengeance

Associated Press
October 5, 2009

Flanked by heavily armed fighters, the new leader of the Pakistani Taliban sat on a blue blanket, amiable and relaxed as he cracked jokes and mixed in threats of vengeance for deadly U.S. airstrikes.

One day later, a suicide bomber attacked a U.N. office in Islamabad.

Hakimullah Mehsud met with reporters Sunday for the first time since winning control of the militant group, quashing speculation that he had been slain in a succession struggle following the killing of his predecessor in a U.S. drone attack.

He also described his group's relationship to al-Qaida as one of "love and affection." Osama bin Laden and other top al-Qaida leaders are believed to be hiding out in the remote border region with Afghanistan, possibly in territory controlled by Hakimullah.

The militant vowed to retaliate against the U.S. and Pakistan for deadly attacks on his allies and said his fighters will repel an anticipated Pakistani offensive into his stronghold.

Hakimullah made his threat of vengeance hours before a suicide bomber disguised as a security officer killed five people at a U.N. office in Islamabad on Monday. There was no immediate claim of responsibility, but authorities blamed Islamic militants.

Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik has said several times that officials believed Hakimullah _ and possibly his deputy, Waliur Rehman _ had been killed in fighting over who would replace Baitullah Mehsud after his Aug. 5 death in a missile strike. Malik said that Hakimullah was being impersonated by his brother, including in calls to media organizations.

Western diplomats in Islamabad had also said their intelligence indicated he may have been killed, while Western media reports over the weekend quoted American officials as saying they believed he may be dead.

Hakimullah was very much alive, speaking calmly as he sat under a tree on a blanket surrounded by top Taliban commanders, including Waliur Rehman, in a show of unity in South Waziristan, where the Pakistani state and security forces have little or no presence. Also present were Qari Hussain, the head of the Taliban's suicide bomb faction, and Azam Tariq, a Taliban spokesman.

He told five Pakistani reporters, including one from The Associated Press, that the group's leadership remained intact and unified.
"We all are sitting before you, which proves all the news about myself ... was totally baseless and false," he said.
Pakistani security authorities were not immediately available for comment.

Pakistan has largely beaten back a Taliban insurgency in the northwestern Swat Valley in recent months and intelligence officials say the country is preparing a major offensive against al-Qaida and the Taliban in South Waziristan. The military has been blockading the region and seeking to encourage other tribes to rise up against Hakimullah.

Hakimullah said his forces were ready for such an attack, which would likely be far tougher than the Swat campaign. The army has been beaten back there three times since 2004. Analysts say some 10,000 well-armed militants, including foreign fighters, are in the mountainous region and well dug in.
"We are fully prepared for that operation and we will give full proof of those preparations once the offensive is launched," he said.
On the drive to and from the interview, the AP reporter could see fighters taking up positions at key vantage points. Residents said the militants were digging trenches along routes the army was expected to travel.

Fearing the coming offensive, civilians were fleeing the area via backroads and traveling at night because the military had already sealed most of the main routes out.

While Baitullah avoided the glare of media and was only photographed once _ from a side angle _ Hakimullah showed no such modesty.

He did not appear to be a nervous fugitive in hiding from Pakistan soldiers and U.S. drones.

His tunic was clean, white and freshly pressed, and his manner at ease as he spent more than seven hours chatting and eating with the reporters. Two goats were brought out for slaughter for lunch.

At one point, he pulled out a laptop to show his guests an Afghan comedian's standup routine about jihadi _ or holy war _ groups. On the serious side, he also showed pre-attack video testimony made by a suicide bomber.

Hakimullah spoke flanked by fighters wielding automatic rifles and rocket-propelled grenades. He agreed to be interviewed on condition his comments not be published until the reporters left the area Monday.

One of Baitullah's deputies, Hakimullah was known for brazen strikes on civilians, claiming responsibility for the June 9 bombing of the Pearl Continental Hotel in Peshawar and the attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore earlier this year.

U.S. officials are watching closely to see whether Hakimullah will direct more fighters across the border where U.S. and NATO forces face attacks by insurgents. Baitullah was believed to have mainly concentrated on attacking Pakistani targets.

Hakimullah did not address that issue directly, only saying there were no "difference between Taliban of Afghanistan and Pakistan." He said the Pakistani Taliban were fighting for the imposition of Islamic law in Pakistan and to rid it from the "clutches of the Americans and the Jews."
"For this very purpose, we will enhance and prolong our jihadi efforts," he said.
Hakimullah also introduced a man he identified as Qari Mohammad Zafar, who has a $5 million bounty on his head from the U.S. Justice Department in the 2002 bombing of the U.S. consulate in Karachi that killed three Pakistanis and a U.S. diplomat.
"See, we have such people with us. And they are saying that we have differences. It is an example that we are united," he said.
He vowed his forces would avenge Baitullah Mehsud's killing and would strike back at Pakistan and the U.S. for the increasing airstrikes.

Unmanned drones have carried out more than 70 missile strikes in northwestern Pakistan in the last year in a covert program, killing several militant commanders along with sympathizers and civilians. The Pakistani government publicly protests the attacks but is widely believed to sanction them and provide intelligence for at least some.
"There is no doubt that American spy planes are being used in these attacks, but we know all the intelligence is being provided by Pakistan," Hakimullah said. "We have taken revenge for the past attacks and we will definitely take revenge for the remaining drone attacks."

North Korea

Kim Tells Wen N. Korea Ready to Resume Nuclear Talks

Bloomberg
October 6, 2009

Kim Jong Il told Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao that North Korea is conditionally prepared to return to six-nation nuclear disarmament talks the regime in April said it was abandoning forever.

Kim yesterday told Wen in Pyongyang that returning to the talks depends on North Korea’s dialogue with the U.S., the Korean Central News Agency reported. The Obama administration responded by saying it is willing to hold bilateral negotiations that lead North Korea to “complete denuclearization.”

Wen’s three-day visit, which ended today, comes as China leads a renewed effort to bring Kim’s government back to disarmament talks. China is North Korea’s largest trading partner and host of the forum, which also involves South Korea, the U.S., Japan and Russia.
“There’s been pressure put on North Korea from just about everyone on this,” said Phil Deans, a professor of international affairs at Temple University in Tokyo. “The Chinese have tried the hardest. The symbolism looks big, it looks like there’s real change, but you have to be skeptical. They’ve switched the nuclear program on and off so many times.”
Reaction in South Korea and Japan was cautious.
“While the move itself is welcome, it remains to be seen what North Korea’s real intentions are,” South Korea’s Foreign Minister Yu Myung Hwan said today at a seminar in Seoul. The U.S. and North Korea may soon contact each other, he said.
Japan’s top spokesman, Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirofumi Hirano, said his government was seeking confirmation from China on North Korea’s change in stance.
“We want to work together with China to make this a reality,” Hirano told reporters in Tokyo.
‘Hostile Relationship’

The “hostile relationship” between North Korea and the U.S. should be “converted into peaceful ties through the bilateral talks without fail,” KCNA said Kim told Wen.

North Korea pulled out of the six-party forum in April after the United Nations condemned the country for launching a missile over Japan, then tested a nuclear bomb a month later. The U.S. said last month it would consent to direct discussions with Kim’s regime as part of the larger disarmament talks.
“The U.S. remains willing to engage North Korea bilaterally within the framework of the six-party process,” State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said in a statement. “As we’ve said before, we and our six-party partners want North Korea to engage in a dialogue that leads to complete and verifiable denuclearization of the Korean peninsula through irreversible steps.”
The six-party talks were last held in December when North Korea wrangled with other countries over how to verify the extent of its atomic work. Kim’s government agreed in February 2007 to scrap its nuclear program in return for energy aid and normalized diplomatic ties with the U.S. and Japan.

UN Sanctions
“There is a common understanding between five partner countries that we will sincerely implement the UN sanctions until North Korea shows a real change in attitude on the nuclear issue,” Yu said today. North Korea should soon make a “strategic decision” on whether to give up its nuclear weapons ambitions or continue to isolate itself from the rest of the world, he said.
The UN Security Council voted unanimously in June to adopt a U.S.-backed resolution punishing North Korea for its second nuclear test. The measure curbs loans and money transfers to North Korea and stepped up inspection of cargoes containing material that might contribute to the development of nuclear weapons or ballistic missiles.

North Korea is now in the final stage of restoring its nuclear facilities, Yonhap News reported today, citing an unnamed South Korean government official. In a letter to the Security Council last month, the communist country said it was “weaponizing” plutonium and had almost succeeded in highly enriching uranium, the second means for making a nuclear device.

North Korea Says It Is Ready to Return to Nuclear Talks

Reuters
October 6, 2009

North Korea on Tuesday signalled it could return to nuclear disarmament talks it had declared dead six months ago, but a report it was near restoring its atomic plant underlined the secretive state would keep the stakes high.

Leader Kim Jong-il told Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao on a rare visit to Pyongyang that he first wanted talks with the United States. The North sees such talks as key to ending its status as a global pariah that it argues gives it no choice but to have a nuclear arsenal.
"The hostile relations between the DPRK (North Korea) and the United States should be converted into peaceful ties through the bilateral talks without fail," the North's KCNA news agency quoted Kim as saying.

"We expressed our readiness to hold multilateral talks, depending on the outcome of the DPRK-U.S. talks. The six-party talks are also included in the multilateral talks."
In April, a month before its second nuclear test, North Korea said the six-party talks -- between the two Koreas, China, Japan, Russia and the United States -- were finished for good. It walked away from those talks last December.

This is the first time it has suggested it was might return to what has been the only international forum to try to make the North give up dreams of becoming a nuclear warrior in return for massive aid to fix an economy broken by years of mismanagement.

One analyst said it boiled down to impoverished North Korea hoping to convince Washington to end its economic squeeze and the United States wanting to be certain that Pyongyang will not sell any nuclear weaponry abroad.
"North Korea wants sanctions removed ... What the United States wants is some assurance about proliferation because the U.S. doesn't really care about restoration of an obsolete nuclear plant or how much nuclear material the North has got," said Cho Min of the Korea Institute of National Unification.
He said the focus was now on whether Washington sends an official, possibly special envoy Stephen Bosworth, to the North.

The U.S. government has said it is open to direct talks with the North to coax it back to nuclear talks.

NEW ELEMENT

The North's chief source of material to build a bomb has been its Yongbyon facilities which it had agreed to dismantle during six-party talks but later said it would restore, accusing the United States of planning to attack it.
"We have obtained indications that point to restoration work being in the final stages," an unnamed South Korean government source was quoted by Yonhap news agency as saying.
North Korea says it is U.S. hostility, and the 28,000 U.S. troops stationed in South Korea, that is the problem.

It has long sought direct talks with the United States, in part to agree a formal peace treaty to the 1950-53 Korean War and gain full diplomatic relations, which would in turn give it access to international financial aid.

The U.S. administration is under pressure to come up with a new tack in dealing with the reclusive state that has for years played cat and mouse in negotiations with the international community, never giving up trying to build a nuclear arsenal.
"An effective American strategy towards North Korea will require a combination of tough measures with serious dialogue and engagement," Joel Wit, an academic and former U.S. State Department official working on North Korea, wrote in a report. He said a policy of containment and isolation only conceded that North Korea will further develop its nuclear programme.

"That, in turn, will undermine stability in East Asia, sow doubts in Tokyo and Seoul about relying too much on the United States for their security and jeopardise cooperation with China."
CHINA BOOST

The visit by the Chinese premier has been a major boost for Kim, increasingly shunned by the international community for nuclear and missile tests earlier this year and facing tougher sanctions. Analysts say the punitive measures hurt its weapons trade, an important source of scarce foreign income.
"There is no doubt that Wen delivered a very clear cut message, China wanted to give a push -- which has been fruitful so far. But you can also understand that North Korea will not just compromise very substantially after just one visit because it is not their style," said Zhu Feng, professor of international security at Peking University.

"The key question is not just how to bring them back to the negotiating table but also how to change their behaviour ... that's why my interpretation of Wen's visit is that he delivered a clear cut message and gave North Korea a very timely push, you can't always hesitate, you can't always fool around, you can't always just play tricks...otherwise time is running out and the effects will be very negative for North Korea."

Report: North Korea Nearly Restores Atomic Facilities

Associated Press
October 5, 2009

North Korea is in the final stage of restoring its nuclear facilities, a news report said Tuesday, as leader Kim Jong Il expressed a conditional willingness to end Pyongyang's boycott of international nuclear talks.

South Korean and U.S. intelligence authorities reached the conclusion after scrutinizing about 10 atomic facilities in North Korea since April when the communist regime vowed to restart its nuclear program in anger over a U.N. rebuke of its long-range rocket launch.

Pyongyang claimed the launch was a peaceful attempt to put a satellite into orbit, but the liftoff was widely condemned as a test of the North's long-range missile technology.

The report came as North Korean leader Kim Jong Il told Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao that his country was prepared to return to six-party nuclear disarmament talks depending on progress in its two-way negotiations with the United States.

Kim's comments, carried by official North Korean and Chinese media, were the clearest sign yet that Pyongyang was readying to resume the six-nation talks it withdrew from after conducting missile tests in April and a second nuclear test in May.

The stalled talks involve China, Japan, the two Koreas, Russia and the U.S.

In their meeting late Monday, Kim said that North Korea "is willing to attend multilateral talks, including the six-party talks, depending on the progress in its talks with the United States," China's Xinhua News Agency said in a report issued early Tuesday.

North Korea has long sought one-on-one negotiations with the U.S., claiming that it was compelled to develop nuclear weapons to cope with what it calls the "U.S. hostile policy" and "nuclear threats" against the regime.

Yonhap also cited the government source as saying that North Korea has conducted missile engine tests a few times recently on the country's west coast at a new missile launch site that is in the final stage of construction.

News reports said earlier this year that the North had moved a long-range missile to the new site for a possible test launch, but Yonhap said Tuesday that the missile has been moved elsewhere. The report did not elaborate.

Meanwhile, South Korea's JoongAng Ilbo newspaper reported that the youngest son of Kim Jong Il could be officially named an heir to the communist dynasty as early as next year. The paper cited a South Korean government report to a ruling party lawmaker.

Talk of who will take over North Korea after Kim Jong Il intensified after Kim reportedly suffered a stroke last year. The third son, Kim Jong Un, is widely believed to be the favorite.

October 5, 2009

Israel, the U.S. and the Arab World

Iran Wins Six-Power Legitimacy for Uranium Enrichment - Contrary to UN Resolutions

DEBKAfile Special Report
October 5, 2009

If Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov is to be believed, Iran came out of its first diplomatic engagement with the big powers flushed with success. Not only has Tehran gained international legitimacy for its enriched uranium program - contrary to UN Security Council resolutions - but third-nation help is on tap for reaching a higher grade of enrichment.

Monday, Oct. 5, Lavrov let the cat out of the bag when he said in Vienna that an agreement reached between Tehran and six world powers last week for Russia to help enrich uranium for an Iranian reactor had yet to be finalized.

He said experts would meet soon to implement the plan, after the IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei stated in Tehran Sunday that the experts would meet in Vienna Oct. 19 to discuss the deal for Russia to take some of Iran's processed uranium and enrich it further.

The Russian minister referred to "an Iranian reactor," whereas the IAEA chief spoke of enriched uranium to be reprocessed abroad "for use as medical isotopes." Visitors are shown around a small medical reactor in Tehran to demonstrate that its nuclear program is innocuous although Western intelligence believes it to be a link in Iran's covert plutonium bomb project.

The plan to be cleared in Vienna is for the transfer of Iran's stock of uranium enriched to 3-5 percent to Russia where it would be further reprocessed to 19.75 percent. Former US ambassador to the UN John Bolton explained Monday that this level "is barely under the 20 percent definition of weapons-grade" uranium.

None of the representatives of the big powers attending last Thursday's meeting with the Iranian negotiator Saeed Jalili last Thursday, Oct. 1, revealed that Russia's helping hand would effectively jump-start Iran to cover the distance to 90 percent enrichment in no more than a week or two.

The Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Hassan Ghashghavi was perfectly correct when he said there has been no change in his government's "nuclear stance" as a result of the Geneva conference. Not only has Iran not given an inch, but it is presenting the conference and the IAEA chief's visit as "Western acknowledgement of its right to pursue civil nuclear technology including enrichment."

The harsh sanctions hanging over Iran's head have melted away. Indeed, Tehran is effectively off the hook of past sanctions which punished it for pursuing a banned enrichment program.

Furthermore, Moscow will boost enriched uranium stocks four to fivefold.

If the Vienna meeting on Oct. 19 approves this arrangement, it will cut the ground from under any US or Israeli demands for further UN sanctions. It is therefore hard to understand why the Israeli government headed by Binyamin Netanyahu has not spoken up in protest against a deal which shortens Iran's road to a nuclear weapon.

ElBaradei Says Nuclear Israel Number One Threat to Mideast

Xinhua
October 4, 2009

Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Mohamed ElBaradei said Sunday that "Israel is number one threat to Middle East" with its nuclear arms, the official IRNA news agency reported.

At a joint press conference with Iran's Atomic Energy Organization chief Ali Akbar Salehi in Tehran, ElBaradei brought Israel under spotlight and said that the Tel Aviv regime has refused to allow inspections into its nuclear installations for 30years, the report said.
"Israel is the number one threat to the Middle East given the nuclear arms it possesses," ElBaradei was quoted as saying.
Israel is widely assumed to have nuclear capabilities, although it refuses to confirm or deny the allegation.
"This (possession of nuclear arms) was the cause for some proper measures to gain access to its (Israel's) power plants ... and the U.S. president has done some positive measures for the inspections to happen," said ElBaradei.
ElBaradei arrived in Iran Saturday for talks with Iranian officials over Tehran's nuclear program.

Leaders of the United States, France and Britain have condemned Iran's alleged deception to the international community involving covert activities in its new underground nuclear site.

Last month, Iran confirmed that it is building a new nuclear fuel enrichment plant near its northwestern city of Qom. In reaction, the IAEA asked Tehran to provide detailed information and access to the new nuclear facility as soon as possible.

On Sunday, ElBaradei said the UN nuclear watchdog would inspect Iran's new uranium plant near Qom on Oct. 25.

Back to The Lamb Slain Home Page